MADRAS HIGH COURT
Mr. Sudheshwaran – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector – Respondent
WP 6440/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Reserved on
Pronounced on
28.04.2022
06.06.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
W.P. NOS.6440, 6918, 6445, 4692, 4693, 4908, 7454, 6914,
6909 & 4620 OF 2022
AND
W.M.P. NOS.4811 TO 4816, 5053, 4740, 4741, 6534, 6539,
7460, 7461,
7463, 6948, 6946, 6536, 6541, 4811, 5057, 6532, 5056, 6540,
6950 TO
6954, 6956, 6947 & 4742 OF 2022
Sudheshwaran
..Petitioner in W.P.NO.6440 OF 2022
Vasantha
..Petitioner in W.P.No.6918 of 2022
James ..Petitioner in W.P.No.6445 of 2022
Munirathinam ..Petitioner in W.P.No.4692 of 2022
Rajan Babu ..Petitioner in W.P.No.4693 of 2022
P.Senthilkumar ..Petitioner in W.P.No.4908 of 2022
Dhanaseelan ..Petitioner in W.P.No.7454 of 2022
Suventhiran ..Petitioner in W.P.No.6914 of 2022
Premkumar ..Petitioner in W.P.No.6909 of 2022
Murugan ..Petitioner in W.P.No.4620 of 2022
- Vs -
1. The District Collector
Dharmapuri District
Dharmapuri 636 705.
2. The District Revenue Officer
Dharmapuri District
Dharmapuri 636 705.
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer
Dharmapuri Division
Dharmapuri District
Dharmapuri 636 701.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
4. The Tahsildar
Palacode Taluk
Dharmapuri District
Dharmapuri 636 808.
5. The Village Administrative Officer
Jakkasamudram Village
Palacode Taluk
Dharmapuri Dt. 636 808.
6. The Commissioner
Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments
Uthamar Gandhi Road
Nungambakkam
Chennai 600 034.
7. The Joint Commissioner
Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments
Kottai Mariamman Temple
Salem 636 001.
8. The Assistant Commissioner
Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments
Dharmapuri 636 701.
9. The Executive Officer
Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments
Palacode
Dharmapuri District 636 808.
10. The District Registrar
Dharmapuri District
Dharmapuri 636 701.
...Respondents in All WPs
Common Prayer: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India praying this Court to issue a writ of
certiorarified mandamus to call for the entire records in
pursuant to the impugned order dated 11.01.2022 on the file of
the 2nd respondent/District Revenue Officer, Dharmapuri, in
connection with the impugned order of cancellation of patta in
her proceedings in Na.Ka. No.15881/2019/Pa2 dated 11.01.2022 and
quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to issue
patta in the name of the petitioner within the time limit fixed
by this Court.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
For Petitioners: Mr. C.Umashankar (in all Wps)
For Respondents: Mr.P.Sathish, AGP for RR-1 to 5
Mr. N.R.R.Arun Natarajan, Spl. GP
For RR-6 to 9 (in all Wps)
COMMON ORDER
The cancellation of patta, which had been granted in favour
of the respective petitioners upon purchase of the lands from
the legal heirs of the original pattadars, on the premise that
the lands in issue are ‘Devadayam’ lands and that it belongs to
the ‘Arulmighu Adhinarayanaswamy Temple’ passed by the 2nd
respondent, viz., District Revenue Officer, has been put to test
before this Court in the present batch of writ petitions.
2.The facts leading to the filing of the writ petitions, as
could be culled out from the present petitions, are as under :-
The Government, in exercise of the powers under the Madras
Minor Inams (Abolition & Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, (for
short ‘the Act’), had taken over the lands covered by T.D.
No.543 on 15.2.1965 and as a result of the taking over, the inam
tenure stood extinguished and the lands stood converted into
ryotwari. Since no claim was made with regard to the said lands
on the basis of the Madras Minor Inams (Abolition & Conversion
into Ryotwari) Rules, 1965, suo motu enquiry was initiated by
the Settlement Officer pursuant to which notices were duly
served on th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.