SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

MADRAS HIGH COURT
SHANBI – Appellant
Versus
SADER – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S C PRABAKARAN', '', 'M SIVAKUMAR', 'R SADER', '', 'S/O ABDUL RAHIMAN', 'R ABDUL RAHIMAN', 'S/O DASTAGIR SAHIB', 'R RAJIYA', 'W/O ABDUL RAHIMAN', 'R MAAJAN', 'W/O ALLIGAN LATE', 'R AKBAR BASHA', 'S/O HOZUR SAHIB', 'R BASHA', 'R BABU', 'R SHIEK KHADER', 'S/O DASTAGIR SAHIB BISMILLA']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated: 19.12.2016

Coram:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA

C.R.P.(PD).396 of 2014

and

M.P.No.1 of 2014

Shanbi ... Petitioner/Plantiff

vs.

Alligan(died)

1.Sader

2.Abdul Rahiman

3.Rajiya

4.Maajan

5.Akbar Basha

6.Basha

7.Babu

8.Shiek Khader .. Respondents/Defandants

Petition filed under Section 227 of the Constitution of

India against the fair and decreetal order dated 18.11.2013,

made in I.A.No.914 of 2013 in O.S.No.327 of 2008, on the file of

the District Munsif Court at Krishnagiri.

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prabakaran

For Respondents : No appearance

ORDER

This civil revision petition is filed by the

plaintiff in the suit, which is for declaration of title and for

consequential injunction.

2. It is stated that during the pendency of the suit,

when the case was posted for cross-examination of the plaintiff,

she had come to know that there were wrong averments in the

plaint, including the name of her husband and she accepted the

same due to inadvertence. Therefore, I.A.No.914 of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top