SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mr.G.Bhaskar – Appellant
Versus
Chennai Angadi (A unit of Vamshree Enterprises) – Respondent
A 1810/2022



1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

(ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION)

THURSDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE 2022

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

A.No.1810 of 2022

in

C.S.(Comm.Div) No. 58 of 2021

Mr. G. Bhaskar

Rep by its Proprietor,

Chennai Angadi

Having office at Old No:8, New No:15,

Ground Floor, Muthu Street,

Mylapore, Landmark : Sri Varasiddhi

Vinayagar Alayam,

Chennai - 600 004.

...Applicant/Plaintiff

-Vs-

Chennai Angadi, A unit of Vamshree Enterprises

Registered office at No: 894,

Munusamy Salai, K.K.Nagar West,

Landmark: Opp Yes Bank

Chennai, Tamilnadu - 600 078.

And also,

Manufacturing and Branch office address at:

Chennai One IT-Special Economic Zone,

Pallavaram, Thoraipakam, 200 Ft Road,

Chennai, Tamilnadu - 600 096

Rep by Mr.Vamshee Bharani,

Managing Director of Vamshree Enterprises ...Respondent/Defendant

Original Application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to

award exemplary additional cost of Rs.5 Lakhs for filing a false affidavit by

the defendant before this Hon'ble Court.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2

This Application coming on this day before this court for hearing, the

court made the following order:-

The defendant filed an affidavit dated 15.12.2021. The said affidavit

was affirmed by Vamshee Bharani, the Managing Partner of the defendant.

In the said affidavit, the defendant stated that he had closed two shops at

K.K.Nagar and Pallavaram, respectively, in August 2021 and March 2020

respectively. It was further stated therein that he has not sold any products

using online platforms, including mobile applications and websites. In

effect, the statement of the defendant is that the impugned mark is not being

used.

2. The applicant / plaintiff has presented this application for

awarding exemplary costs of Rs.5,00,000/- for filing a false affidavit. In

support of the said application, the applicant has filed the printout of the

Goods and Services Tax Registration in the name of Vamshee Enterprises.

On the basis of the said document, the applicant states that the defendant is

continuing to use the infringing mark. In support of this contention, the

applicant relies on the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules 2017 and, in

particular, Rule 19 thereof.

3. The scope of the suit is limited to alleged trademark infringement

and passing off by use of marks that are identical to or deceptively similar to

the plaintiff's trademark, Chennaiangadi. As such, the conduct of business

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3

by the defendant under the name Vamshee Enterprises is irrelevant.

Therefore, A.No.1810 of 2022 is dismissed.

Sd./-SKRJ.

23/06/2022

//Certified to be true copy//

Dated at Madras this the

day of

2022.

COURT OFFICER(O.S.)

From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies

of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

EVK 30/06/2022

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top