Back
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DHANDAPANI – Appellant
Versus
CHINNAPONNU (A) CHELLA BANGI – Respondent
CRP 2099/2016
['M/S S VIJAY ANAND', '', 'T VANITHA SRI ROHINI DEVI', 'R- CHINNAPONNU ALIAS CHELLA BANGI', 'R- VASANTHA CHINNANDIKUPPAM', 'CHIDAMBARAM TK', 'CUDDALORE DT', '', 'R- RAMALINGAM', 'AT SALEM MAIN ROAD', 'RAMACHANDHIRANPETTAI', 'KASPA VIRUDHACHALAM', 'VIRUDHACHALAM TK', 'R- MARIMUTHU AT SALEM MAIN ROAD', 'R- ELANGO', 'R- AMBIGA PARATHOOR', 'PRIVATE NOTICE', '', 'AOS FILED REG R TO R - SERVED THROUGH LOWER COURT COUNCIL']
Civil Revision Petition(PD)No.2099 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 10.03.2022
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD
Civil Revision Petition(PD)No.2099 of 2016
1. Dhandapani
2. Senthil Kumar
... Petitioners
Vs.
1. Chinnaponnu @ Chella bangi
2. Ramalingam
3. Marimuthu
4. Elango
5. Ambiga
6. Vasantha
... Respondents
This Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution
of India, praying to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 14.08.2015
passed in I.A.No.547 of 2013 in O.S.No.143 of 2004 by the Principal
Subordinate Judge, Virudhachalam.
For Petitioners
:
No Appearance
For Respondents
:
No Appearance
Page No.1 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Civil Revision Petition(PD)No.2099 of 2016
ORDER
When the matter was listed for hearing on earlier occasion i.e. on
12.01.2022 and 25.02.2022, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners.
Hence, this Court directed the Registry to list the matter on 10.03.2022 under
the caption "For Dismissal".
2. Even today, i.e. 10.03.2022, when the matter was taken up for
hearing, there was no representation for the petitioners. Hence, the matter
was passed over and again it was called at 03:30 p.m., none appeared on
behalf of the petitioners.
3. Thus, it is clear and evident that the petitioners are not interested in
pursuing the matter and this Court has no other option except to dismiss this
Civil Revision Petition for non-prosecution.
4.
In view of the above, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for
non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected C.M.P.No.10964 of
2016 is closed.
10.03.2022
Index
:
Yes/No
Page No.2 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Civil Revision Petition(PD)No.2099 of 2016
Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order
(vm)
To:
The Principal Subordinate Judge,
Virudhachalam.
Page No.3 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Civil Revision Petition(PD)No.2099 of 2016
J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD,J.
(vm)
Order in
C.R.P(PD)No.2099 of 2016
Page No.4 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Civil Revision Petition(PD)No.2099 of 2016
10.03.2022
Page No.5 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
