SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MADRAS HIGH COURT
RAJKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE – Respondent


Advocates:
['m/s n manokaran', '', 'S VINOTH KUMAR', 'PUBLIC PROSECUTOR']

Bail Slip

The Accused namely Rajkumar and Madhesh @ Madhewaran, were

released on bail vide order dated 28.06.2013 made in Crl.MP 1 of

2013 in Crl.A.No.302/2012 and dated 16.04.2013 made in Crl.MP

No.1/2013 in Crl.A.No.427 of 2012.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 01.02.2016

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN

AND

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU

CRIMINAL APPEAL Nos. 302 and 427 of 2012

Rajkumar

.. Appellant in Crl.A.No.302 of 2012/

Accused No.1.

Madhesh

@ Madheswaran

.. Appellant in Crl.A.No.427 of 2012 /

Accused No.2.

Vs.

State by Inspector of Police

Puduchathiram Police Station

Namakkal District.

Crime No.22 of 2009

.. Respondent in both Appeals /

Complainant

Both Criminal Appeals are preferred under Section 374(2)

Cr.P.C against the judgment of conviction and sentence passed by

the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Fast Track

Court, Namakkal, made in S.C.No. 68 of 2010, dated 19.03.2012.

For Appellants

: Mr.N.Manokaran

in both Appeals

For Respondent

: Mr.M.Maharaja

in both Appeals

Additional Public Prosecutor

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

J U D G M E N T

(The judgment of the Court was ma

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top