HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SATHIYA SELVAM – Appellant
Versus
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE – Respondent
CRL A 166/2013
['M/S T BALAJI', '', 'A THIYAGARAJAN', 'PUBLIC PROSECUTOR']
BAIL SLIP
The Appellant/Accused namely Sathya Selvam, S/o.Nalliyappan
aged about 25 years was directed to be released on bail as per
the Order of this Court dated 14.03.2013 in Crl.M.P.No.1 of 2013
in Crl.A.No.166 of 2013 on the file of this Court.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 17-2-2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M. JAICHANDREN
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S. NAGAMUTHU
Criminal Appeal No.166 of 2013
Sathiya Selvam
... Appellant/Accused
Vs.
State by the Inspector of Police,
Chinnaselam Police Station,
Crime No.428 of 2010
... Respondent/Complainant
This Criminal Appeal has been preferred under Section 374(2)
of Code of Criminal Procedure, challenging the conviction and
sentence imposed by the learned III Additional District and
Sessions Judge, Kallakurichi, Villupuram District by judgment
made in S.C.No.168 of 2011 on 19.2.2013.
For Appellant/Accused
:
Mr.A.G.Rajan
For Respndent/State
:
Mr.M.Maharaja
Additional Public Prosecutor
J U D G M E N T
S. NAGAMUTHU, J.
The Appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.168 of 2011 on
the file of III Additional District and Sessions Judge,
Kallakurichi, Villupuram District, who was charged for the
offences under Sections 302, 201 r/w 302 and 506(ii) IPC. By
Judgment dated 19.2.2013, the trial Court acquitted the accused
from the charge under Section 506(ii) IPC and convicted him for
the offences under Section 302 and 201 r/w 302 IPC. The
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
accused was sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and to pay a
file of Rs.500/-, i/d to undergo six months simple imprisonment
for the offence under Section 302 IPC; and five years rigorous
imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.500/-, i/d to undergo six
months simple imprisonment for the offence under section 201 r/w
302 IPC. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the
accused is before this Court with this appeal.
2.
The case of the prosecution in brief is as follows:
(a)
The deceased in this case was one Krishnamurthy @
Thangamani. One Sivakumar (PW-1) is the eldest son of
Nalliappan (PW-6). The accused Sathiya Selvam is the second
son and the deceased Krishnamurthy @ Thangamani is the third son
of Nalliappan (PW-6). Nalliappan was living separately.
Sivakumar got married and he was also living separately. The
accused and the deceased were living along with their mother and
grandmother.
(b)
For quite sometime, there was a dispute between the
family members in respect of partition of the joint family
properties. The deceased Krishnamurthy @ Thangamani was
insisting that the properties should be partitioned in four
equal shares and one such share should be allotted to the father
and mother. But the accused was not agreeable for the same,
which resulted in ill-feeling between them. This is stated to
be the motive for the occurrence.
(c)
On 5.11.2010 at about 3.30 a.m., the deceased
Krishnamurthy @ Thangamani was sleeping in the house of
Sivakumar (PW-1). At that time, the accused entered into the
house of Sivakumar and cut the deceased indiscriminately with
Koduval (MO-1). Then the accused himself raised alarm, as
though the deceased was cut by somebody else. This attracted
the neighbours.
(d)
The accused himself took the deceased to Sanjeevi
Hospital, Kallakurichi, a private hospital, in 108 Ambulance,
from where he was taken to JIPMER hospital, Puducherry. On the
way near Villupuram, the deceased breathed his last.
(e)
The body of the deceased Krishnamurthy @ Thangamani was
brought to the Government Hospital at Kallakurichi. The
hospital authorities refused to receive the body and directed to
go to the Police Station. Therefore, the accused himself went
to the Police Station and made a complaint (Ex.P-7) at 8.45 a.m.
on 5.11.2010, in which he alleged that on hearing the alarm
raised by the deceased, he