HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.KONGALLAIYA, AGED 25 YEARS – Appellant
Versus
STATE REP. BY – Respondent
CRL A 872/2016
['M/S C SIVAKUMAR', '', 'A MOHAMED ISMAIL', 'PUBLIC PROSECUTOR']
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 14..02..2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE
Criminal Appeal No.872 of 2016
M.Kongallaiya
... Appellant /Sole Accused
-Versus-
State Rep. by
The Inspector of Police,
Kadathur Police Station,
Erode District.
[Crime No.331 of 2013]
... Respondent
Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C against
the judgement of conviction and sentence passed by the learned
Sessions Judge, Mahalir Neethimandram, [Mahila Fast Track
Court], Erode dated 29.01.2016 made in S.C.No.37/2015.
For Appellant
: Mr.C.Sivakumar
For Respondent
: Mr.P.Govindarajan,
A.P.P
JUDGEMENT
(Judgement of the Court was delivered by S.NAGAMUTHU, J.)
The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.37 of 2015 on
the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila [Fast Track]
Court, Erode. He stood charged for offence under Section 302 and
201(i) of IPC. The trial court, by judgement dated 29.01.2016,
convicted the appellant under both the charges and sentenced him
to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/-
in default to suffer simple imprisonment for two years for
offence under Section 302 of IPC and to undergo rigorous
imprisonment for seven years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- in
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
default to suffer simple imprisonment for two years for offence
under Section 201(i) of IPC. Challenging the above said
conviction and sentences, the accused is before this court with
this criminal appeal.
2. The case of the prosecution in brief is as follows:-
The deceased in this case was one Mrs.Meenakshi. Three years
before the occurrence, the accused married the deceased. It was
a love marriage. They were residing at the house of one
Mr.Mathialagan at Arasur Village. The accused was working in a
private company. Though three years had passed after the
marriage, they were not blessed with any child. The accused took
the deceased to a Doctor , who declared that there was no chance
for the deceased to bear a child. The accused, therefore,
decided to go in for second marriage . He requested the deceased
to give consent for the second marriage, but, the deceased
declined. Therefore, the accused decided to do away with the
deceased. It is further alleged that on 07.07.2013, when the
accused told the deceased about the impossibility of having a
child, the deceased told that they could end their lives by
committing suicide. The accused also agreed for the same. Then,
taking a nylon rope, the accused had led the deceased to a
nearby river where he tied one end of the nylon rope to his
waist and the other end to the waist of the deceased. They
both jumped into the river , but, the deceased escaped and came
to the bank. The accused got infuriated. Therefore, according
to the case, he hit the deceased, pushed her down, strangulated
her and killed her. Then, he dragged the body to a nearby bush
and abandoned the dead body there. He, thereafter, returned
home, took kerosene , went to the place of occurrence, poured
kerosene and set fire to the dead body. The occurrence was not
witnessed by anyone.
3. P.W.1, the Village Administrative Officer of
Makkinamkombai village found the dead body of the deceased in a
half burnt condition on 07.07.2013. However, the identity of
the dead body was not known. He made a complaint (Ex.P.1)to the
police on the same day. The Sub Inspector of Police, Kadathur
Police Station, on receipt of the said complaint, registered a
case in Crime No.331 of 2013 under Section 174 of Cr.P.C. for
"Suspicious Death". Ex.P.20 is the FIR. Then, he forwarded both
the complaint and the FIR to the court. Then, he handed over
the case diary to the Inspector of Police for investigation.
4. The case