SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MADRAS HIGH COURT
THIRUPATHY – Appellant
Versus
THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR – Respondent


Advocates:
['m/s m mohana sundaram', '', 'T N LAKSHMI NARASIMAN', 'PUBLIC PROSECUTOR', '', 'M/S C RAMKUMAR', 'N SANTHOSH']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 06.10.2015

Coram

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B. RAJENDRAN

Criminal Revision Case No. 1361 of 2012

Thirupathy

...Petitioner

Versus

1. The State represented by

The Public Prosecutor

2. Mr.Nazar

...Respondents

Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 and 401 of

Cr.P.C. to call for the records and set aside the conviction and

sentence confirmed in the judgment dated 11.10.2012 by the

Hon`ble III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore

in Criminal Appeal No.200 of 2012 preferred against C.C.No.398

of 2011 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast

Track Court at Magisterial Level- II, Coimbatore.

For Petitioner

:

Mr. Mohana Sundaram

For Respondent 1

:

Mr.V.Arul

Government Advocate

For Respondent 2

:

Mr.C.Ramkumar

ORDER

The petitioner stood charged for the offences punishable

under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act and tried

before the learned Fast Track Court (Magisterial Level- II)

Coimbatore. Ultimately, after trial, the petitioner was

convicted for the offences under Section 138 of the Negotiable

Instrument Act and sentenced to undergo three m

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top