SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MADRAS HIGH COURT
R.PARI (54 YEARS) – Appellant
Versus
SREEPRAKASH (50 YEARS) – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S A V ARUN', '', 'R VINOTH KUMAR', 'R SIDHARTH', 'M/S K V SRIDHARAN', '', 'JAYASRI BASKAR']

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 24.10.2016

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.T. SELVAM

Crl.R.C.No.1057 of 2016

and

Crl.M.P.Nos.8986 and 8987 of 2016

R.Pari

S/o.M.Rajalilngam

.. Petitioner

vs.

Sreeprakash

.. Respondent

Criminal Revision filed under section 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. to set aside

the order dated 18.03.2006 passed in C.M.P.Nos.6372 of 2015 in STC

Nos.577 of 2009 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.III, Salem by

allowing criminal revisions.

For Petitioner

:

Mr.A.V.Arun

For Respondent

:

Mr.K.V.Sridharan

*****

http://www.judis.nic.in

2

O R D E R

The revision petition challenges the order of dismissal dated

18.03.2016 passed in in C.M.P.No.6372 of 2015 in STC No.577 of 2009 by

learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Salem.

2.Petitioner faces trial in STC No.577 of 2009 on the file of learned

Judicial Magistrate No.III, Salem for offence under Section 138 of the

Negotiable Instrument Act. The petitioner moved a petition in

C.M.P.No.6372 of 2015 seeking discharge. Court below under order dated

18.03.2016 dismissed such petition. Hence, this revision.

3.Hea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top