Chennai Vazh Sattankulam – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner – Respondent
WP 31192/2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.02.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
W.P.No.31192 of 2016
and
W.M.P.No.27065 of 2016
Chennai Vazh Sattankulam Vattara Nadar
Uravinmurai Sangam,
Regd.No.876/1979,
Rep by its President, A.Krishanan,
No.37/5, Arya Gowder Road, West Mambalam,
Chennai – 600 033.
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Commissioner,
Greater Chennai Corporation,
Ripon Buildings,
Chennai – 600 003.
2.The Member Secretary,
CMDA, Chennai – 8.
(R2 Suo-moto impleaded as per
order dated 13.08.2018).
... Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of
Mandamus, forbearing the respondent, his men, agents
subordinates, servants or officials from in any manner
interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the
Private property of the Petitioner's Sangam comprised in Revenue
Survey No.598/1 and 598/2, Velacherry Village, Saidapet Taluk,
measuring an extent of about 13,000 Sq.ft, bounded on the North
by Plot No.37 and 40, South by 40 feet Road, east by 24 feet
Road and West by 24 Feet Road bearing Patta No.6762.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.R.Suresh
For Respondents: Mr.Ganesan,
Standing Counsel for R1
Mr.Tamilmani,
Standing Counsel for R2
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
O R D E R
Earlier the petitioner had filed W.P.No.29801 of 2005
against the Commisioner, Alandur Municipality represented by its
Commissioner which has been merged that the respondent Greater
Chennai Corporation. In the said writ petition, the petitioner
had secured an interim order dated 16.09.2005 which was made
absolute on 26.10.2006. Thereafter, the writ petition was
disposed by the order dated 22.01.2003 with the following
observations:
5.Since the petitioiner claims to be in
possession of the property in question
for several years, the Writ Petition is
disposed of by observing that it is
open to the Corporation of Chennai, to
take action against the petitioner if
they have encroached into the property
of the Corporation of Chennai, after
giving notice to the petitioner.
2.The petitioner has now filed the present writ petition
stating that the 1st respondent is encroaching on the property of
the petitioner which was settled in favour of the petitioner's
trust under a settlement deed dated 25.03.1982 and that the
petitioner has been in possession of the said property and patta
has been issued by the Revenue Authorities in favour of the
petitioner as early as 13.01.1994. The 1st respondent has filed
a counter. In para 4 it has been stated as follows:
4.I respectfully submit that the said
vacant land measuring 5 ground and 100
sq.ft (i.e 13000 sq.ft) in Survey No.598/1
and 598/2 in Velacherry Village was
originally allotted for communcal and
recreation purpose in the approved layout
No.6/76 by former MMDA (presently CMDA) in
the year 1976. Presently those lands
allotted for communcal and rereation
purposes are mentioned as OSR (Open space
reservation) used for public parks and
playfield area by local bodies and
Municipal Corporations. Those OSR lands
could not be sold to any third persons by
the layout promoter. This was sold by a
gift deed to the petitioner by the legal
heirs of the layout promoter as per the
document No.1227/1982 at the Sub Regiter
Office of Saidapet. Based on the document
the petitionern obtains Patta. Also letter
has been sent by Greater Chennai
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Corporation to Thasildar, Velacherry to
cancel the Patta issued to the petitioner.
3.It is further submitted that the land in question is a OSR
land allotted in the layout can not be allowed for any civil
structures and only parks playfied with basic amenities cou
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.