HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
BHARANI @ BHARANIDHARAN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE REP BY – Respondent
CRL OP 11818/2022
['M/S T VINOTH KUMAR', '', 'SONAI POTHIRAJAN', 'PUBLIC PROSECUTOR']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Sixth day of June Two Thousand Twenty Two
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.11818 of 2022
AGAINST
S.C.No.57 OF 2022
(On the file of I Additional Assistant Sessions Court, Villupuram)
BHARANI @ BHARANIDHARAN
[ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]
Vs
THE STATE REP BY, [ RESPONDENT ]
STATION HOUSE OFICER,
THIRUKOVILUR POLICE STATION,
VILLUPURAM DISTRICT.
CRIME NO.293/2015
For Petitioner : M/S.T.VINOTH KUMAR Advocate
For Respondent : M/S. A.DAMODARAN, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
PETITION FOR BAIL 439 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody
on 10.01.2022 on execution of Non-Bailable Warrant issued by the
learned I Additional Assistant Sessions Judge, Villupuram for the
offence under Sections 294(b), 324, 506(ii), 307 and 34 of IPC in
S.C.No.57 of 2022 in respect of crime No.293 of 2015, seeks bail.
2. It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioner was
arrayed as an accused in crime No.293 of 2015 under Sections 294(b),
324, 506(ii), 307 and 34 of IPC and on filing of charge sheet, the
same was taken cognizance by the learned I Additional Assistant
Sessions Judge, Villupuram in SC.No.57 of 2022, which is pending.
Thereafter, the petitioner did not appear before the lower Court
regularly. Hence, the lower Court has issued Non-Bailable Warrant
against the petitioner. Thereafter, the petitioner was produced
before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirukovilur through P.T.
Warrant on 10.01.2022.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit
that the non-appearance before the lower Court by the petitioner is
neither wilful nor wanton. However, he would also submit that the
petitioner is ready to abide any condition as imposed by this Court
and seeks for grant of bail to the petitioner.
4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the
petitioner herein is the accused in SC.No.57 of 2022. Due to non-
appearance of the petitioner before the lower Court, the trial judge
has issued Non-Bailable Warrant on 31.08.2017 against the petitioner
and the petitioner was produced through P.T. warrant only on
10.01.2022, and if the bail is granted to the petitioner, it is very
difficult to secure him. Hence, he vehemently objected for grant of
bail to the petitioner.
5.It is seen that after completion of investigation, the
respondent filed final report and the same has been taken cognizance
in SC.No.57 of 2022 on the file of the learned I Additional Assistant
Sessions Judge, Villupuram. However, the petitioner was absent before
the trial court. As such on NBW, he was produced through P.T warrant
on 10.01.2022.
6.Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, this
Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the
petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond
for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two blood
related sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the
learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirukovilur, Villupuram District and on
further conditions that:
[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb
Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of
their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.
[b] the petitioner shall report before trial Court viz.,
I Additional Assistant Sessions Court, Villupuram daily at 10.30 a.m
and 05.30 p.m. until further orders.
[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation
or trial.
[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness
either during investigation or trial.
[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the lea