SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MADRAS HIGH COURT


Advocates:
['M/S I C VASUDEVAN', '', 'R NIRMALA', 'FOR A AND A', 'A TO A', 'M/S V RAJAMOHAN', 'C R MALARVANNAN', 'A - AMALRAJ', 'ARCHEDIN', 'NONSUCH POST', 'COONOOR TK', 'NOTICE SENT SERVICE AWAITED', 'ON A', 'PUBLIC PROSECUTOR']

Crl.A.No.123 of 2004

and Crl.R.C.No.1063 of 2003

Crl.A.No.123 of 2004

and

Crl.R.C.No.1063 of 2003

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

Further to the communication addressed by the learned

Assistant Sessions Judge in Dis.No.156 / 2016 dated 10.02.2016 with

regard to S.C.No.2 of 2002 on the file of the Assistant Sessions Court,

Udhagamandalam, this Court, after perusal of records, had passed a

detailed order on 21.11.2016 with a direction to the Registry to issue

notice to the 1st accused viz. Amalraj, through the concerned Court and

also to serve notice through the Superintendent of Police, Nilgiris.

However, it is seen that the order passed by this Court on 21.11.2016 has

not been complied with by the Registry.

2.Registry is directed to comply with the order dated

21.11.2016.

3.On the last hearing dated 21.11.2016, this Court had also

observed that the learned counsel Mr.I.C.Vasudevan who had appeared

1/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

Crl.A.No.123 of 2004

and Crl.R.C.No.1063 of 2003

for the 1st accused viz. Amalraj, had filed a memo stating that he had

withdrawn his appearance and returned the case bundles to the 1st

accused / Amalra

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top