SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HARIHARA BAGH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE, REPRESENTED BY – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S R SANKARASUBBU', '', 'S MATHIVANAN', 'D PADMAPRIYA', 'S JEEVANANTHAN', 'A SIVAKUMAR @ SIVAAJI', 'P LOGANATHAN', 'A RAMESH', 'PUBLIC PROSECUTOR', '', 'REPORT', 'D NO', 'DT']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 29.06.2022

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

Crl.O.P.No.11918 of 2022

Hari Hara Bagh

...Petitioner

Vs.

State, Rep. by

Inspector of Police,

NIB, CID, Kancheepuram,

Kancheepuram District.

Cr. No.3 of 2022

...Respondent

PRAYER:-Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 439 of

Cr.P.C. praying to enlarge him on bail in connection with the Crime

No.3 of 2022 pending investigation on the file of the Inspector of

Police, NIB, CID, Kancheepuram

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sankarasubbu

For Respondent : Mr.A.Damodaran,

Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial

custody on 21.01.2022 for the offence under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)

(c), 29(1) of the NDPS Act in crime No.3 of 2022 on the file of the

respondent police, seeks bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that totally there are three

accused, in which, the petitioner is arrayed as A3. It is alleged

that A1 and A2 had jointly were in possession of 10 and 12 kgs of

Ganja in two bags and the specific allegation against the petitioner

herein is that, the petitioner had given money to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top