HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KANNAN – Appellant
Versus
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE – Respondent
CRL OP 26625/2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06.11.2015
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH
Crl.O.P.No.26625 of 2015
Kannan
... Petitioner
Vs.
The Inspector of Police,
S-6, Shankar Nagar Police Station,
Chennai-75.
... Respondent
Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal
Procedure Code praying to direct the respondent-Police to
register a case based on the complaint given by the petitioner
dated 20.10.2015 and investigate the matter in accordance with
law.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Karnan
For Respondent : Mr.C.Emalias APP
ORDER
This petition has been filed seeking to direct the
respondent-Police to register a case on the basis of the
petitioner's complaint dated 20.10.2015 and investigate the
matter in accordance with law.
2.In the affidavit filed in support of this petition, it
has been stated by the petitioner that the petitioner's wife
Shanthi had purchased a house property in Plot No.4, Kambar
Street, Abdul Kalam Nagar, Cowl Bazzar, Chennai, from one
Nalini Nagalakshmi W/o.Sundaraj and the same is registered in
Document No.5013/2014, dated 07.07.2014. After purchasing the
above said property, the petitioner started construction.
While so, one Vijaya and her sister Mala, Siva and others
conspired together and they created forged voter I.D and
Vodafone phone bill receipts and also created a lease deed by
using the above said forged documents, they had filed a suit
in O.S.No.762/2014 on the file of District Munsif Court at
Alandur and they also filed an injunction application in
I.A.No.1264/2014 and obtained an exparte interim injunction.
Using the exparte injunction, the said accused persons
threatened the petitioner and his family members to stop
further construction in the above said house property. On
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
25.09.2015, the District Munsif Court at Alandur found that
the above said documents, which was produced by the above said
Vijaya, were fabricated and hence by recording the same the
exparte injunction granted in her favour was vacated by the
Court. On 19.10.2015, in order to complete the construction
work the petitioner went to the above said property; at that
time the above said Shanthi and her sister Mala and their
henchmen restrained the petitioner from entering into the
property and abused the petitioner in filthy language and also
threatened
the
petitioner
with
dire
consequences.
Immediately the petitioner gave a complaint dated 20.10.2015
with the respondent-police and the same was duly received by
the respondent, vide CSR.No.828/2015. But, thereafter no
action was taken by the respondent-Police. Hence, the
petitioner has come forward with the present petition.
3.Heard both sides. The learned Additional Public
Prosecutor submitted that after conducting enquiry, the
respondent-Police closed the petitioner's complaint, since the
Civil Suit is already pending between the parties before the
District Munsif Court, Alandur.
4.Since the complaint has already been closed by the
respondent-Police, at this stage, this Court cannot give any
direction as sought for by the petitioner. It is always open
to the petitioner to work out his remedy under Section 154(3)
or 156(3) of Cr.P.C. Hence, this criminal original petition
is dismissed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS IV)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
ssv
To,
1.The Inspector of Police,
S-6, Shankar Nagar Police Station,
Chennai-75.
2.The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
+ 1 cc to Mr.V. Karnan, Advocate sR.61644
Crl.O.P.No.26625 of 2015
AR-II
Eu 25.11.15
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/