HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
THIRUMANIGANDAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE REP. BY – Respondent
CRL RC 427/2019
['M/S K PRAGADEESH KUMAR', '', 'T S LAVANESH', 'PUBLIC PROSECUTOR']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 12.07.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH
Crl.R.C.No.427 of 2019
Thirumanigandan
S/o.Perumal
... Petitioner
-Vs-
1. State rep. by
The Inspector of Police
Ammapet Police Station
Salem.
2. K.N.Venkatesan
S/o.C.Natarajan
.. Respondents
* 2nd respondent is suo-moto impleaded
as per the order of this Court dated 13.06.2019
in Crl.RC.No.427 of 2019
Criminal Revision Petition filed under section 397
r/w 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to set aside
the order passed in CMP.No.606 of 2019 on the file of the
learned Judicial Magistrate No.5, Salem, dated 08.03.2019
and direct the respondent to return the property namely,
the TATA INDICA Car bearing Registration No.TN-10-AL-4548
belong to the petitioner.
For Petitioner :
Mr.K.Pragadeesh Kumar
For Respondent :
Mrs.Kritika Kamal.P
Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
for R1
O R D E R
This Criminal Revision Petition has been filed to
set aside the order dated 08.03.2019 passed in CMP.No.606
of 2019 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court
No.5, Salem, and to direct the respondent to return the
property namely, the TATA INDICA Car bearing Registration
No.TN-10-AL-4548 belonging to the petitioner.
2. Today, Mr.Ananthakumar, Assistant Commissioner of
Police, Law and Order, North Range, Salem City,
Mr.M.Krishnamoorthy, Inspector of Police, Ammapet Police
Station, Salem City and Mr.K.N.Venkatesan, the second
respondent, are present before this Court.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and
the learned Government Advocate for the first respondent.
4. On 21.06.2019, this Court passed the following
order:
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
"The Inspector of Police, Ammapet
Police Station, is investigating the case in
Ammapet Police Station Crime No.546 of 2018,
initially registered for 'man missing' and
later on altered to one under Section 387,
364, 302 and 201 I.P.C. During the course of
investigation, it came to light that the
accused involved in this case had abducted
one
Gopi
and
had
murdered
him.
Subsequently, the police seized a Tata
Indica car bearing Registration No.TN-10-AL-
4548 and produced the same before the
Judicial
Magistrate
No.V,
Salem.
Thirumanigandan, one of the accused in this
case filed C.M.P.No.606 of 2019 in Crime
No.546 of 2018 under Section 451 Cr.P.C. for
return of the said vehicle.
While
dismissing the petition on 08.03.2019, the
learned Judicial Magistrate No.V, Salem has
made the following observation.
“It is also pertinent to note
that already one K.N.Venkatesan,
made petition as if he is the real
owner of the vehicle that too in
Sessions Case on the material
evidence. The same was dismissed
by this Court on 10.01.2019.
Being
material
evidence
in
Sessions Case, this Court is not
inclined to grant interim custody
of the vehicle to the accused.”
2. Therefore, this Court directed the
police to bring Mr.K.N.Venkatesan for
enquiry.
Today, Mr.K.N.Venkatesan, S/o
C.Natarajan appeared before this Court and
stated that he had purchased the said car
some time in the year 2013 and in the year
2018, he exchanged the car through
M/s.Maansarovar Automobile Pvt Ltd., Porur,
Chennai, for a new one, and he further
categorically stated that he had not filed
any petition for return of the property
before the Judicial Magistrate No.V, Salem.
3. Mr.Bhaskaran, Sub Inspector of
Police, Ammapet Police Station is also
present in Court today. In view of the
categorical
assertion
made
by
Mr.K.N.Venkatesan that he had not filed any
petition for return of property before the
Judicial Magistrate No.V, Salem, it has
become imperative to conduct a thorough
enquiry in this regard.
4. Therefore, this Court directs the
Assistant Commissioner of Police (North),
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Sa