HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.Jaiganesh – Appellant
Versus
Kirthika – Respondent
OP 466/2020
['M/s M Eghambharam', 'S Premkumar', '', 'Vak filed on D No']
Order dated 17.08.2021 in O.P.No.466 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 17.08.2021
Coram:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN
Original Petition No.466 of 2020
P.Jaiganesh, S/o Late R.Palaniswamy
.. Petitioner
Vs.
1. Mrs.Kirthika, Wife of Late P.Hari Kumar
2. Mrs.P.Usha, Wife of Mr.Palani, Daughter of Late Palaniswamy
3. Mrs.A.Asha Rani, Wife of Mr.Anbalagan, Daughter of Late Palaniswamy
4. Mrs.S.Iswarya, Wife of Mr.Shankar, Daughter of Late Palaniswamy
.. Respondents
Original Petition filed under Sections 232 and 276 of the Indian
Succession Act, 1925 (XXXIX of 1925) read with Order XXV Rule 5 of the
Original Side Rules of this Court, praying to grant Letters of Administration
with the Will, having effect limited to the State of Tamil Nadu.
For petitioner : Mr.M.Eghambaram
For respondents: No appearance
Page No.
1 / 11
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Order dated 17.08.2021 in O.P.No.466 of 2020
ORDER
This Petition has been filed to grant Letters of Administration with
the Will annexed, as the brother/legatee named under the Will of the
deceased P.Harikumar, having effect limited to the State of Tamil Nadu.
2. In the petition, it is stated as follows:
(a) The testator Late P.Harikumar is the younger brother of the
petitioner. The first respondent is wife and respondents 2 to 4 are the sisters
of the testator. The petitioner had been named legatee as per the above said
Will executed by the testator, dated 03.12.2014. As per the Will, the testator
bequeathed the properties in enjoyment in favour of the petitioner. After the
life-time of the testator, the petitioner shall have absolute rights to enjoy the
properties and to alienate the properties and all other right to deal with the
properties in any manner. The testator had expired naturally on 26.12.2015
at his residence at No.383/101 G.Saratha College Main Road,
Azhagapuram, Salem District, Salem-636 016, where he was then ordinarily
residing and breathed his last. The testator had expired leaving behind the
petitioner and the respondents as his legal heirs.
Page No.
2 / 11
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Order dated 17.08.2021 in O.P.No.466 of 2020
(b) The petitioner has described in the schedule of immovable
properties owned by the testator, which is situated within the State of Tamil
Nadu and Chennai, within the jurisdiction of this Court. The testator, during
his life-time, had executed a Will, dated 03.12.2014 in the presence of two
independent witnesses, (i) M.Muniyan son of S.Muthurangan, residing at
No.133, West Namachivayapuram, Choolaimedu, Chennai-600 094, and
(2)D.A.Silambharasu, son of Dhanasekaran, residing at No.1, B.R.Garden,
Broadway Road, Chennai-600 108, bequeathing the properties in favour of
the petitioner. The writing hereto annexed and marked "A" is the last Will
of the deceased.
(c) The Original Will being the last testament of the testator and was
duly executed by him at Salem on 03.12.2014 in the presence of the said
two independent witnesses and whose names appear at the foot of the Will
at the witnesses column. Under the said Will, the deceased had not
appointed any Executor. The amount of assets which are likely to come into
the petitioner's hands, does not exceed in the aggregate the sum of
Rs.5,21,01,984/- and the net amount of the said assets after deducting all
items, which the petitioner by law allowed to deduct, is only of the value of
Page No.
3 / 11
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Order dated 17.08.2021 in O.P.No.466 of 2020
Rs.5,20,81,984/-.
(d) No application has been made to any District Court or delegate or
to any other High Court for probate of any Will of the deceased or Letters of
Administration with or without the Will annexed of his properties and
credits.
(e) The petitioner undertakes to duly administer the properties and
credits of the deceased and in any way concerning