SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.ARUN – Appellant
Versus
STATE REP BY – Respondent
CRL OP 28522/2015



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 26.11.2015

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH

Crl.O.P.No.28522 of 2015

S.Arun

... Petitioner

Vs

State rep. by the Inspector of Police,

All women Police Station,

Chengalpattu,

Kancheepuram District.

... Respondent

Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

prayed to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner and

his family members under the guise of investigation in the odd

hours.

For Petitioner :

Mr.R.Arunkumar

For respondent :

Mr.C.Emalias,

Addl.Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

This petition has been filed to direct the respondent not to

harass the petitioner and his family members under the guise of

investigation.

2. The case of the petitioner is that he married one

G.R.Saranya. Subsequently, due to misunderstanding between them

the petitioner filed divorce petition before Principal Family

Court, Chennai in OP.No.3707 of 2014. Since G.R.Saranya was

continuously absent before the said Court, an exparte divorce

was granted on 09.04.2015. The said exparte divorce order was

also published in Dina Bhoomi paper on 23.04.2015. Thereafter, a

false complaint was lodged by the said Saranya as against this

petitioner, his father, mother and sister and now under the

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

guise of enquiry, the respondent police are calling and

harassing the petitioner and his family members. Hence, the

present petition.

3. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that in

view of the complaint given, the petitioner is called for

enquiry and there is no intention on the part of the respondent

police to harass the petitioner and his family members.

4. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel

appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public

Prosecution, this Court is constrained to pass the following

order:-

(i) The petitioner is directed to cooperate with

the enquiry.

(ii) The respondent police is directed to

conduct the enquiry in accordance with law, without

harassing the petitioner and his family members.

5. The criminal original petition is disposed of

accordingly.

Sd/-

Assistant Registrar(CS-III)

True Copy

Sub Assistant Registrar

To

1.The Inspector of Police,

All Women Police Station,

Chengalpattu,

Kancheepuram District.

2.The Public Prosecutor,

High Court, Madras.

+2cc to M/S.S.Arunkumar, Advocate sr.64103

Crl.O.P.No.28522 of 2015

srg 30/11/2015

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top