HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
A.Thangam – Appellant
Versus
The District Registrar – Respondent
WP 16365/2019
['M/s K Jayakumaar', '', 'p arumugam', 'YOGESH KANNADASAN GOVT ADVOCATE TAKES NOTICE']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 20.10.2021
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE V. BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
W.P.Nos.16365 & 16530 of 2019
A. Thangam
..Petitioner in WP.16365/2019
R. Malliga
..Petitioner in WP.16530/2019
Versus
1. The District Registrar
Office of District Registrar,
Guindy, Chennai - 600 032.
2. The Sub Registrar,
Pammal Sub Registrar Office,
Anagaputhur, Chennai - 600 070.
3. The Commissioner, HR & CE Board,
Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 034.
... Respondents in both
[R3 impleaded as per order in
WP.No.17803/2019
WMP.No.17802/2019 dated 06.08.2019]
Common Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus,
directing the 1st respondent to dispose of the petitioner's
representation dated 20.04.2019 made for withdraw the
registration of cancellation order dated 27.11.2011 (copy
received on 19.12.2018) and to direct the 2nd respondent to
execute the registration of the petitioner's sale deed Document
Nos.18 and 19 of 1996 respectively.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Jayakumar
(in both WPs)
For RR1 to 2 : Mr.V.Veluchamy
(in both WPs) Government Advocate.
COMMON ORDER
These writ petitions have been filed for issuance of Writ of
Mandamus, to direct the 1st respondent to dispose of the
petitioner's representation dated 20.04.2019 made for withdraw
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
the registration of cancellation order dated 27.11.2011 and for
consequential direction to the 2nd respondent to execute the
registration of the petitioner's sale deed Document Nos.18 and
19 of 1996 respectively.
2. The property "Sri Ramalinga Swamyar Samarasa Sanmarga
Sabai" situated at Chengalpet M.G.R.District, Saidai Taluk,
Village No.87, Anagaputhur Village, comprised in Survey No.226/1
ad-measuring to an extent of 30 cents was originally belonged to
the aforesaid "Sabai" and all the Revenue Records stand in its
name. The said "Sabai" decided to sell the aforesaid property
for development of the said "Sabai" and also its affinity temple
"Sri Selvamottai Vinayagar"
temple's refurbishment and
maintenance expenses based on the resolution dated 04.05.1993.
Subsequently, a resolution was passed to appoint sole decision
making authority namely Mr.Buthira Veerabhathra Chettiyar on
this properties' future subject of sale. Thereafter, the said
Buthira Veerabhathra Chettiyar executed a General Power of
Attorney in favour of one Mr.G.Dhanapal, dated 26.06.1996 and
the same was registered as Doc.No.717 of 1996 on the file of Sub
Registrar, Pallavaram. As per the Power of Attorney Deed, the
Agent G.Dhanapal, plotted out the said property as residential
layout plots and the petitioners have also wanted to purchase
the said plots and the said G.Dhanapal agreed to sell the
property in Plot No.6 measuring to an extent of 1186 sqft and
227 sqft, a half of the portion of adjacent lane area to the
petitioners at the total cost of Rs.12,995/-. On 05.12.1996,
the petitioners had paid the entire amount of Rs.12,995/- to
Mr.G.Dhanapal to purchase the said plots. Consequently, the
said G.Dhanapal executed the sale deeds in favour of them and
the same were presented before the Sub Registrar, Pamal, for
registration as Doc.Nos.18 and 19 of 1996 and the same have not
been released and put on hold from the year 2018. During the
hold period from 1996 to 2018, the petitioners and their sons
made several attempts to get the registered documents from the
Sub Registrar Office. The Sub-Registrar stated that the reason
for holding the said documents, because of the petitioners have
to get No Objection Certificate from the Hindu Religious and
Charitable Endowment (HR&CE), the Board has not issued any
certificate to the petitioners. Hence, the Sub-Registrar made a
suo motu decision and passed a re