MADRAS HIGH COURT
M/S UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO – Appellant
Versus
V.GIRIPRASATH – Respondent
CMA 3400/2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 01.02.2013
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR
C.M.A.No.3400 of 2012
M.P.No.1 of 2012
The United India Insurance Co. Ltd.,
Branch Office at No.3,
Giriram Buildings, Main Road,
Gobichettipalayam.
... Appellant/3rd Respondent
vs.
1.V.Giriprasath 1st Respondent/Petitioner
2.A.Muthukumar
3.S.K.M.Egg Products Export (India) Ltd.,
Erode to Karur Main Road,
Cholangapalayam,
Pasur Post, Erode 638 154.
... Respondents 2 & 3/
Respondents 1 & 2
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 Motor Vehicles
Act, 1988 against the Judgment and decree, dated 25.05.2012, made in
M.C.O.P.No.86 of 2011, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims
Tribunal, (Chief Judicial Magistrate Court), Erode.
For Appellant
: Mr.M.B.Gopalan
For 1st respondent : Mr.R.Nalliyappan
J U D G M E N T
Being aggrieved by the award, dated 25.05.2012, made in
M.C.O.P.No.86 of 2011, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims
Tribunal, (Chief Judicial Magistrate Court), Erode, the present
appeal has been filed.
2.
Short facts leading to the appeal are as follows:
That on 27.01.2011, about 18.30 Hours, while the
respondent/claimant was riding a Moped, bearing Registration No.TN 33
L 3731, on Solangapalayam to Palanigoundenpalayam Road, near
Kolkarar's house in Chathiram, Kilambadi Village, a Motorcycle,
bearing Registration No.TN 33 AB 7958, insured with the appellant-
Insurance Company, which came from the opposite direction, driven by
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
the 2nd respondent herein, in a rash and negligent manner, dashed
against the TVS-50 Moped. In the result, the respondent/claimant
sustained fracture in the left arm, radius and also in occipital
bone. Plates were implanted in the left hand. He was hospitalised
for a period between 27.01.2011 and 12.02.2011 in Kovai Medical
Centre Hospital, Erode. In this regard, a case in Cr.No.23 of 2011,
has been registered against the rider of the Motorcycle, 2nd
respondent, for the offences under Sections 279 and 337 IPC, on the
file of Malayampalayam Police Station. For pecuniary and non-
pecuniary losses, the respondent/claimant claimed compensation of
Rs.12,00,000/-.
3.
The appellant-Insurance Company has opposed the claim,
contending inter alia that it was the rider of TVS Moped, bearing
Registration No.TN 33 L 3731, was negligent in causing the accident
and hence, the Company is not liable to pay compensation. They
further submitted that the rider of the Motorcycle, bearing
Registration No.TN 33 AB 7958, did not possess a valid and effective
driving licence, at the time of accident and that therefore, for the
violation of policy condition, the insurer cannot be fastened with
the liability to pay compensation to the accident victims. Without
prejudice to the above, they also disputed the compensation, claimed
under various heads.
4.
Before the Tribunal, the respondent/claimant examined
himself as PW.1.
PW.2, is the Doctor, who examined the
respondent/claimant, with reference to medical records and PW.3, is
the cashier of KMC hospital. Ex.P1 – FIR, Ex.P2 – Observation
Mahazar, Ex.P3 – Rough Sketch, Exs.P4 and P5 – Motor Vehicles
Inspector's Report, Ex.P6 – Wound Certificate, Ex.P7 – Charge Sheet,
Exs.P8 and P9 – Medical Bills, Ex.P10 – Hospital Bill, Ex.P11 –
Discharge Summary, Ex.P12 – Driving Licence, Ex.P13 – Computer
Science Certificate issued by Bharathiyar University, Ex.P14 –
Identity Card issued by Kongu Engineering College, Ex.P15 – Statement
of Accounts for Genera Advance for the period from 01.01.2010 to
21.11.2011, Ex.P16 – Canara Bank Pass Book, Ex.P17 – Kongu
Engineering College bus receipt, Ex.P18 – Kongu Engineering College
Transfer
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.