SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MADRAS HIGH COURT
M.Kothandaraman – Appellant
Versus
The Chairman – Respondent


Advocates:
['MANISEKARAN V', '', 'D GUNASEKARAN', 'B DIVYA', 'R KARTHIKEYAN STANDING COUNSEL TAKES NOTICE']

IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Reserved On

13.08.2019

Pronounced On

05/09/19

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH

AND

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

W.P.No.18142 of 2019

M.Kothandaraman

... Petitioner

vs

1.The Chairman,

Chennai Port Trust,

Rajaji Salai, Chennai – 600 001.

2.The Deputy Conservator,

Marine Department,

Chennai Port Trust, Rajaji Salai,

Chennai – 600 001.

... Respondents

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Certiorarified

Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction in

the nature of a Writ, calling for the entire records of

the 2nd respondent impugned order No.D2/211/2019/M dated

29.03.2019 and quash the same and directing the

respondents to pay the pensionary benefits, Earned Leave

Encashment and terminal benefits including Gratuity,

Commutation of Pension on attaining the age of

superannuation on 31.03.2019 within a stipulated time.

For Petitioner

: Mr.L.Chandrakumar

for Mr.Manisekaran .V

For Respondents

: Mr.R.Karthikeyan

O R D E R

C.SARAVANAN,J.

The petitioner has challenged the impugned

Communication dated 29.03.2019 beari

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top