HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SHINE KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
M/S. TEA AND TIFFIN STALL – Respondent
CRL RC 540/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :14.09.2021
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
CRL.R.C.NOS.540,541, 542 & 543 OF 2021
AND
CRL.M.P.NOS.8981, 8978, 8984 & 8988 OF 2021
Shine Kumar,
Proprietor,
M/s.Chillies,
1362, LIG-1, TNEB, 8th Street,
Velacherry,
Chennai – 600 042.
... Petitioner/Accused in all Crl.R.Cs.
Versus
M/s.Tea & Tiffin Stall,
Rep by its Proprietor,
V.Sampath,
Son of Valli Gounder,
No.7, Reddy Street,
Athipet, Ambattur,
Chennai – 600 058.
... Respondent/Complainant in all Crl.R.Cs.
COMMON PRAYER: Criminal Revision Petitions filed under Section
397 r/w Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call
for the records and set aside the judgment in
Crl.Appeal.Nos.204, 201, 202, 205 of 2018 by III Additional
District & Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur at Poonamallee dated
17.03.2021 confirming the order of conviction in C.C.Nos.233,
230, 231, 234 of 2017 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Fast
Track Court at Ambattur(ML) dated 26th October 2018, 8 months
simple imprisonment sentence and direction to pay Rs.220,000/-
as compensation to the Complainant, in default one month simple
imprisonment.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
For Petitioner
: Mr.V.Arunagiri
COMMON ORDER
The Criminal Revision Petitions have been filed to call
for the records and set aside the judgment passed in
Crl.Appeal.Nos.204, 201, 202, 205 of 2018 on the file of the III
Additional District & Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur at Poonamallee,
confirming the order of conviction dated 26.10.2018 passed in
C.C.Nos.233, 230, 231, 234 of 2017 on the file of the the
Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court (Magisterial Level)
Ambattur.
2. The petitioner is the accused and respondent is the
complainant.
3. The respondent filed a private complaints against the
petitioner under section 190(1) (a) r/w 200 Cr.P.C, for the
offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act
before the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court (Magisterial
Level), Ambattur. The learned Magistrate taken cognizance of
the complaints in C.C.Nos.233, 230, 231, 234 of 2017 and after
the enquiry, convicted the petitioner for the offence under
section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced him
to undergo eight months Simple Imprisonment and to pay
compensation of Rs.2,20,000/- within two months in default to
pay the compensation, to undergo further period of one month
simple imprisonment.
4. Challenging the said judgment of conviction and
sentence, the petitioner has filed the appeal before the
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thiruvallur. The learned
Principal District and Sessions Judge taken the appeals on file
in Crl.Appeal.Nos.204, 201, 202, 205 of 2018 and made over the
same to the III Additional District and Sessions Judge,
Tiruvallur at Poonamalle. The learned Additional District and
Sessions Judge, after hearing the arguments advanced on
eitherside, considered the materials and also the judgment of
the learned Magistrate, dismissed the appeals and confirmed the
conviction and sentence passed by the Magistrate. Aggrieved
over the same, the accused has filed the present revision before
this Court.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
5. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit
that the beneficiary of the cheque is only M.V.S.Tea & Tiffin
Stall, whereas the complaint is not filed by the M.V.S.Tea &
Tiffin Stall. Therefore, it is fatal to the case of the
complainant. Further, it not a legally enforciable debt and
given only liability to pay only to M/s.Chillies and where as
the proprietor of M/s.Chillies is not added as accused and
further he would submit that statutory notice was not served to
the petitioner and in the complaint itself, the respondent has
stated that the p