HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.Gnanasekaran – Appellant
Versus
The Joint Registrar of – Respondent
WP 17234/2018
W.P. No.17234 of 2018 and W.M.P. No.20513 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 08.12.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH
W.P. No.17234 of 2018 and W.M.P. No.20513 of 2018
P.Gunasekaran
.. Petitioner
Vs
1.The Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies,
Cuddalore Region,
Cuddalore,
Cuddalore District.
2.The Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies,
Chidambaram Circle,
Chidambaram,
Cuddalore District.
.. Respondents
Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India praying to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for
the entire records relating to the impugned order passed by the
second respondent in his Proceedings Na.Ka.1372/2018/PACCS,
dated 27.06.2018 and consequential order passed by the second
respondent in his Proceedings Na.Ka.No.1372/2018/PACCS, dated
30.06.2018 and quash the same and consequently direct the
respondents to disburse the retirement benefits to the petitioner.
For Petitioner
:
Mr.C.Prakasam
For Respondents :
Mr.K.H.Ravikumar,
Government Advocate
ORDER
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P. No.17234 of 2018 and W.M.P. No.20513 of 2018
This writ petition has been filed, challenging the impugned
Proceedings Na.Ka.1372/2018/PACCS dated 27.06.2018 and
30.06.2018, issued by the second respondent.
2.The petitioner herein, while serving as a Secretary of
Srimushnam Primary Agricultural Co-operative Credit Society, was
placed under suspension by the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative
Societies on 27.06.2018. On 30.06.2018, by an other order, the
petitioner was not permitted to retire from his service. Both these
orders are put under challenge in the present writ petition.
3.Learned Counsel for the petitioner placed reliance on a
decision of this Court for the proposition that the Deputy Registrar of
Co-operative Societies does not have the authority to suspend an
employee of a Co-operative society.
4.A perusal of the order of this Court in the case of the
Management, Tindivanam Primary Co-operative Agriculture and Rural
Development Bank Ltd. vs. the Joint Registrar of Co-operative
Societies passed in W.P. No.2628 of 2015 dated 12.07.2022 shows
that this Court had applied the principle of delegatus non potest
2/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P. No.17234 of 2018 and W.M.P. No.20513 of 2018
delegare and held that when Section 172 of the Tamil Nadu
Co-operative Societies Act empowers the Government to challenge
the powers conferred under Sections 170 and 180 on any authority or
officer and pursuant to such delegation, the Joint Registrar of Co-
operative Societies has been delegated, further delegation to the
Deputy Registrar would amount to usurping all the powers of the
Joint Registrar by the Deputy Registrar and accordingly had
interfered with the impugned proceedings therein.
5.The aforesaid analogy would be applicable to the present
case also. As such the impugned order as well as the consequential
order of not permitting the petitioner to retire from service, cannot
be sustained. Accordingly, the impugned orders dated 27.06.2018
and 30.06.2018 on the file of the second respondent are quashed.
However, if the Joint Registrar is of the view that the petitioner
should be proceeded for any further action under the Act, liberty is
hereby granted to the Joint Registrar Co-operative Societies to take
appropriate action, within a period of sixty days from the date of
receipt of a copy of this order. In case no action is initiated within
the
3/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P. No.17234 of 2018 and W.M.P. No.20513 of 2018
M.S.RAMESH,J.
vga
period of sixty days, the respondents shall forthwith disburse all the
retirement benefits of the petitioner herein within a period of four
weeks from the date of expir