HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KIRUBAKARAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE REP BY – Respondent
CRL OP 17429/2022
['M/S S DHAYANIDHI', '', 'N NARESH', 'PUBLIC PROSECUTOR']
Crl.O.P.No.17429 of 2022
Crl.O.P.No.17429 of 2022
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the
respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 279, 337,
308 of I.P.C. @ Sections 279, 338, 308 of I.P.C & Sections 185 and 188
of M.V.Act, in Crime No.74/AM2/2014, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The petitioner is facing trial in S.C.No.158 of 2017 on the file
of the XV Additional District Court at Chennai, for the offences
punishable under Sections 279, 337, 308 of I.P.C., @ Sections 279, 338,
308 of I.P.C & Sections 185 and 188 of M.V.Act and due to his non
appearance, the trial Court issued Non-bailable warrant as against the
petitioner on 07.12.2019. Hence, the petitioner filed this present petition.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit
that, due to illness, the petitioner was not able to appear before the XV
Additional District Court at Chennai, in respect of the case in
S.C.No.158 of 2017 and hence, non bailable warrant has been issued
Page 1 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.17429 of 2022
against the petitioner. He would further submit that the said absence is
neither willful nor wanton and he undertakes that the petitioner shall
appear before the Court below regularly on all future hearing dates
without fail.
4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the
non bailable warrant has been issued against the petitioner on 07.12.2019
and the same is pending.
5. Considering the undertaking given by the learned counsel for
the petitioner, the petitioner is directed to appear before the XV
Additional District Court at Chennai, within a period of two weeks from
today and to file a petition to recall NBW already issued against him. On
filing of such petition, the concerned learned Judicial Magistrate is
directed to consider the same on merits and pass orders on the same day.
6. It is made clear that while considering the petition to recall, the
Court below shall bear in mind about the period of Non Bailable Warrant
Page 2 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.17429 of 2022
and any crime committed while pending Non Bailable Warrant. Mere
direction issued by this Court to consider the application on the same day
does not amount to direction to consider the recall petition favourably.
7. This criminal original petition is disposed of accordingly.
26.07.2022
mn
Page 3 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.17429 of 2022
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
mn
Crl.O.P.No.17429 of 2022
26.07.2022
Page 4 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis