HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V.ARUN – Appellant
Versus
THE HONOURABLE SUPREME COURT – Respondent
WP 22806/2013
['V ARUN', '', 'PARTY-IN-PERSON', 'CHENNAI']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 19..08..2013
C O R A M
The Honourable Mr. R.K. AGRAWAL, Acting Chief Justice
and
The Honourable Mr. Justice M. SATHYANARAYANAN
Writ Petition No.22806 of 2013
V. Arun
..Petitioner
versus
1.The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India,
Rep. by its Secretary General,
New Delhi.
2. The Hon’ble High Court of Madras,
Rep. by its Registrar General,
Chennai.
3. The National Legal Services Authority,
Rep. by its Member Secretary,
No.12/11, Jam Nagar House,
New Delhi-110 011.
4. The Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority,
Rep. by its Member Secretary,
North Fort Road,
High Court Campus,
Chennai-600104. .. Respondents
Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India for issuance of a writ of mandamus forbearing the respondents
from in any manner allowing, inviting or permitting any of the
accused persons tried before the lower court or the Hon’ble High
Court to attend functions of inauguration of the new building for
Alternative Disputes Resolution Centre and laying foundation stone
for a new Administrative Block for the High Court at the High Court
Campus on 20.8.2013.
- - - - -
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Mr. V. Arun, Petitioner-in-Person
Mr. A.L. Somayaji, Advocate General, Amicus Curiae
O R D E R
The Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice
When one enters the magnificent precincts of this
illustrious Chartered High Court, he notices the statue of a man
standing with two wheels on either side with a calf and a small
child beneath each wheel, and a cow. He becomes anxious to know the
significance as to why and for what purpose this statue is located
near the entrance of the High Court. The statue is that of the
ancient Chozha King, Manu Needhi Chozhan, also known as Elara, who
ruled South India around 250 B.C. Legend is that, Manu Needhi
Chozhan, who believed in even justice towards friends and foes, had
hung a giant Bell in front of his palace and announced that anyone
seeking justice could ring the bell and voice will be heard. One
day, it so happened that a young calf had got crushed under the
wheels of his chariot, in which his only son, young Prince
Veedhividangan, was going around the city. The mother of the calf,
which helplessly watched its little one die, walked to the palace
gates and rang the huge bell, demanding justice from the king. The
king came out and saw the cow, he learnt from his courtiers about the
death of the young calf under the wheels of his son’s chariot.
Unrelenting from his promise for justice, he ordered his own son to
be killed for his recklessness. The prince was killed the same way
the calf had died, being crushed under the wheels of his chariot.
The king went through the same pain the cow had as he witnessed his
son die and thereby, being just at all costs. The Judges of this
Court, since its very inception, have always maintained this great
tradition of the Chozha King and are rendering even justice to all
concerned, whosoever he or she may be, irrespective of the fact
whether they are rich or poor, and whether they occupy a high or a
low status in the society.
2. The framers of our Constitution under Article 219 read
with Schedule-III of the Constitution of India, made it compulsory
for a Judge before entering Office, to take an oath that he will
perform the duties without fear or favour, affection or ill-will,
which a Judge, after entering Office, dutifully follows. No one has
ever raised any finger on the dispensation of justice by this
Chartered High Court. However, a member of the Bar which is an
integral part of dispensation of justice, has now raised a doubt as
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
to how the Chief Justice of the High Court can share t