HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V.BALAKRISHNAN – Appellant
Versus
THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE – Respondent
CRL OP 17037/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 22.09.2021
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR
CRL.O.P.NO.17037 OF 2021
V.Balakrishnan
... Petitioner
Versus
1. The Commissioner of Police,
Coimbatore City,
Near Collectorate,
Coimbatore – 641 018.
2. The Deputy Commissioner of Police,
Office of the Commissioner of Police,
Coimbatore City,
Near Collectorate,
Coimbatore – 641 018.
3. The Assistant Commissioner of Police,
Singanallur,
Coimbatore.
4. The Inspector of Police,
E3, Saravanampatti Police Station,
Saravanampatti,
Coimbatore.
... Respondents
PRAYER:
Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure, directing the respondents not to
harass the petitioner in respect of the civil disputes between
the petitioner and the plaintiffs in O.S.No.729 of 2018, on the
file of the IV Additional Judge District Munsif Court,
Coimbatore.
For Petitioner :
Mr.K.Selvaraj
For Respondents:
Mr.R.Vinoth Raja
Government Advocate [Crl. Side]
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
O R D E R
This Criminal Original Petition is filed to direct the
respondents not to harass the petitioner in respect of the civil
disputes between the petitioner and the plaintiffs in O.S.No.729
of 2018, on the file of the IV Additional Judge District Munsif
Court, Coimbatore.
2.The contention of the petitioner is that the petitioner is
the defendant in a suit filed by the counter complainant's
father. The Advocate Commissioner was appointed in I.A.No.277
of 2018 in O.S.No.729 of 2018 by the IV Additional District
Munsif Court, Coimbatore, even before the final outcome of the
suit, on the guise of the facts and not considering the
petitioner's father old age.
3.The learned Government Advocate [Crl. Side] submitted that
there is a dispute in the pathway. The counter complainant
admits about the civil suit, the only issue is that the
petitioner had earlier lodged a complaint in C.S.R.No.468 of
2021. Now the counter complainant had lodged a complaint and
C.S.R.No.580 of 2021 had been assigned. The petitioner had put
up an obstruction in the path way, for which a complaint had
lodged with the Revenue Divisional Officer and the Revenue
Divisional Officer had initiated proceedings and directed the
Thasildar to inspect the property and sent a report. For the
purpose of finding out the path way and the physical features,
the Revenue Divisional Officer shortly visited the place. The
petitioner is required not to obstruct the enquiry of the
Thasildar and the Revenue officials.
4.In view of the same, the petitioner is directed not to
obstruct the inspection conducted by the Thasildar and the
Revenue Officials and also directed to allow and co-operate with
the Revenue officials to make physical examination and enquiry,
with regard to the path way.
5.With the above observation, this Criminal Original
Petition stands disposed of.
Sd/-
Deputy Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
ah
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
To
1. The Commissioner of Police,
Coimbatore City,
Near Collectorate,
Coimbatore – 641 018.
2. The Deputy Commissioner of Police,
Office of the Commissioner of Police,
Coimbatore City,
Near Collectorate,
Coimbatore – 641 018.
3. The Assistant Commissioner of Police,
Singanallur, Coimbatore.
4. The Inspector of Police,
E3, Saravanampatti Police Station,
Saravanampatti,
Coimbatore.
5. The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
Copy To
1.The IV Additional Judge cum
District Munsif Coimbatore.
2.The Thasildar
Coimbatore.
3.The Revenue Divisional Officer
Coimbatore.
+1cc to Mr.Selvaraj, Advocate, S.R.No.48425
CRL.O.P.No.17037 of 2021
MG(CO)
PM/28/09/2021
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/