HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.GOKULKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
C.JAYASANGEETHA – Respondent
TR CMP 639/2021
['C VASUDEVAN', '', 'r nirmala', 'm karthik', 'FOREIGN ENVELOPE COVER WITH ACK CARD DU REG SOLE RESPDT', '', 'PVT NOTICE', '', 'SOLE RESPDT- NOT CLAIMED ANNUR', 'COIMBATOREA', 'PVT NOTICE THROUGH LOWER COURT', 'C JAYASANGEETHA W/O K GOKULKUMAR', 'PRESENT', 'GREEN PEACE AVALON', 'TH STREET', 'GOPALAPURAM', 'CHENNAI - RES', 'ADDRESS IN USA CARLOW ROAD', 'TORRANCE', 'CALIFORNIA', 'USA', 'PERMANENT ADDRESS', 'SRI', 'KANNANPIRAN OIL MILLS', 'AVINASHI ROAD', 'ANNUR', 'COIMBATORE']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.12.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
Tr.CMP.Nos.639, 650 & 651 of 2021
and
CMP.Nos.16081, 16293 & 16295 of 2021
K.Gokulkumar ...Petitioner in Tr.CMP.No.639 of 2021
C.Jaya Sangeetha ...Petitioner in Tr.CMP.Nos.650 & 651 of 2021
Vs.
C.Jaya Sangeetha ...Respondent in Tr.CMP.No.639 of 2021
1.K.Gokulkumar
...1st Respondent in Tr.CMP.Nos.650 & 651 of 2021
2.Palaniammal
3.E.Kolandavel
...2nd and 3rd Respondents in Tr.CMP.No.650 of
2021
Prayer in Tr.CMP.No.639 of 2021: Transfer civil miscellaneous
petition filed under Section 24 of C.P.C., seeking to withdraw
HMOP.No.3478 of 2021 pending on the file of the Family Court,
Chennai and transfer the same to the Family Court, Erode.
Prayer in Tr.CMP.No.651 of 2021: Transfer civil miscellaneous
petition filed under Section 24 of C.P.C., seeking to withdraw
FCOP.No.200 of 2020 on the file of the Family Court, Erode and
transfer the same to the file of the I-Additional Family Court,
Chennai to be tried along with HMOP.No.3478 of 2021.
Prayer in Tr.CMP.No.650 of 2021: Transfer civil miscellaneous
petition filed under Section 24 of C.P.C., seeking to withdraw
DVA.No.14 of 2020 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate,
Mettupalayam and transfer the same to the file of the I-
Additional Family ourt, Chennai to be tried along with
HMOP.No.3478 of 2021.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
For Petitioner : Mr.I.C.Vasudevan
in Tr.CMP.No.639 of 2021
Mr.J.Saravanavel
in Tr.CMP.Nos.650 & 651 of 2021
For Respondents
: Mr.J.Saravanavel
in Tr.CMP.No.639 of 2021
Mr.I.C.Vasudevan
in Tr.CMP.Nos.650 & 651 of 2021
C O M M O N O R D E R
Transfer CMP.No.639 of 2021 has been filed by the husband
seeking to withdraw HMOP.No.3478 of 2021 filed by the wife on
the file of the Family Court, Chennai to the Family Court, Erode.
2.Tr.CMP.No.650 of 2021 has been filed by the wife seeking
transfer of domestic violence case in DVA.No.14 of 2020 on the
file of the Judicial Magistrate, Mettupalayam to the I-
Additional Family court, Chennai to be tried along with
HMOP.No.3478 of 2021.
3.Tr.CMP.No.651 of 2021 has been filed by the wife seeking
transfer of FCOP.No.200 of 2020 on the file of the Family Court,
Erode to the I-Additional Family Court, Chennai to be tried
along with HMOP.No.3478 of 2021.
4.It is not in dispute that the husband is a resident of
Erode as of today. It is also not in dispute that the wife
lives in United States. The proceeding in DVA.No.14 of 2020 is
pending before a Judicial Magistrate Court, which is a special
Court authorized to try offences under the Protection of Women
from Domestic Violence Act. The proceeding which is under a
special enactment cannot be transferred to be tried along with
HMOPs. Hence, Tr.CMP.No.650 of 2021 is dismissed.
5.As regards the proceedings under the Hindu Marriage Act
namely, HMOP.No.3478 of 2021 and FCOP.No.200 of 2020, the wife,
who is in United States is not going to appear in person in both
these cases. She will have to be necessarily represented by a
power agent. But, the husband, who is a resident of Erode will
have to appear in person in the Family Court at Chennai, if the
matter is transferred to the Family Court at Chennai.
Transferring the proceedings to Chennai would definitely cause
inconvenience to the husband, since the proceedings before the
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Family court requires appearance of parties for every hearing.
Except having the pleasure of inconveniencing the husband, the
wife is not going to achieve anything by getting the case
transferred to the Family court, Chennai.
6.No doubt, the convenience of the wife is taken into
account, but in