SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mr.P.T.Selvakumar and 2 others – Appellant
Versus
Tamil film Producers Council, Rep.by its Special Officer and 4 others – Respondent
OA 724 2020



O.A.No.724 of 2020

in

C.S.No.384 of 2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Reserved on

: 19.03.2021

Pronounced on : 17.04.2021

CORAM

THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE R.PONGIAPPAN

O.A.No.724 of 2020

in

C.S.No.384 of 2020

1. Mr.P.T.Selvakumar

2. Mr.N.Subash Chandra Bose

3. Mr.K.Rajan

... Applicants/Plaintiffs

Vs.

1. Tamil Film Producers Council,

Rep. By its Special Officer,

No.606, Anna Salai,

Chennai – 600 006.

2. The Election Officer,

Tamil Film Producers Council,

No.606, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 006.

3. Mr.R.Radhakrishnan,

Proprietor of Maruthi Films,

No.135, Lakshmi Nagar, First Street,

Sridevi Kuppam, Valasaravakkam,

Chennai – 600 087.

1/30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

O.A.No.724 of 2020

in

C.S.No.384 of 2020

4. Mr.S.Chandra Prakash,

Proprietor of Sri Mishri Productions,

No.21/9, Cenotoph Road, 2nd Lane,

Raj Paris Apartments,

Ground Floor – B, Alwarpet,

Chennai – 600 018.

5. Mr.S.Kathiresan,

Proprietor of Shri Meenakshi Creations,

P.No.37, Bhakiya Lakshmi Nagar,

3rd Street, Near Velanganni School,

Alapakkam,

Chennai – 600 116.

... Respondents/Defendants

Prayer: This application is filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of the Original Side

Rules read with Order XXXIX Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, praying for the

relief of Ad-Interim Injunction restraining the respondents/defendants 3 to 5 from

acting as office bearers to the post of Honorary Secretary, Treasurer and Vice

President pursuant to the election dated 22.11.2020 for the first

respondent/defendant council pending disposal of the Civil Suit.

ORDER

The plaintiffs in C.S.No.384 of 2020 has filed this application, seeking

the relief to grant an order of Ad-Interim Injunction restraining the

2/30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

O.A.No.724 of 2020

in

C.S.No.384 of 2020

respondents/defendants 3 to 5 from acting as office bearers to the post of Honorary

Secretary, Treasurer and Vice President pursuant to the election dated 22.11.2020

for the first respondent/defendant council, pending disposal of the Civil Suit.

2. The case of the applicants in a nut shell, is as follows:

(i) The 1st respondent/defendant is a Society registered and governed

under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975. The 2nd

respondent/defendant is the Election Officer of the 1st respondent/defendant,

appointed by this Court, vide order dated 12.02.2020 in Application No.1685 of

2019 in C.S.No.165 of 2019.

(ii) By way of complying with the directions given by this Court, the 2nd

respondent/defendant issued a notification dated 09.10.2020 on behalf of the 1st

respondent/defendant, announcing the election schedule for electing Office

Bearers and Executive Members of the Tamil Film Producers Council, i.e., the 1st

respondent/defendant for the year 2020-2022. Along with the notification, the 2nd

respondent/defendant issued the rules and guidelines governing the election along

with the applications from 15.10.2020. The 2nd respondent/defendant affixed the

3/30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

O.A.No.724 of 2020

in

C.S.No.384 of 2020

rules and guidelines in the notification board of the 1st respondent/defendant

Society on 15.10.2020.

(iii) In the notification, it has been specifically mentioned in Clause

No.2 that as per Bye-Law 13 of the Tamil Film Producers Council, only those

members who have produced and released a Tamil Straight Picture in the last five

years, are eligible to seek and file nomination to contest in the election of Office

Bearers.

(iv) Contrary to the guidelines given by the 2nd respondent/defendant,

the 3rd, 4th and 5th respondents/defendants herein filed their nominations for the

post of Honorary Secretary, Treasurer and Vice-President respectively.

Respondents 3 to 5, do not possess the prescribed qualification. In this regard, the

applicants/plaintiffs and several others have raised objection against the

nomination filed by the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top