HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SHARATHS.SHARATHI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE REP BY – Respondent
CRL OP 18605/2021
['M/s M DEIVANANDAM', '', 'I HENRY SAMUEL', 'K PRASANTHAN', 'PUBLIC PROSECUTOR', '', 'M/S V K SATHIYAMOORTHY']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 22.12.2021
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR
CRL.O.P.No.18605 of 2021
Sharaths.Sharathi
... Petitioner
Versus
1.State Rep By:-
The Inspector of Police,
W-8, All Women Police Station,
Thirumangalam, Chennai.
2.Jayanthi
... Respondents
[2nd respondent is impleaded as per
order of this Court, dated
18.11.2021 in Crl.M.P.No.11464 of
2021 in Crl.O.P.No.18605 of 2021.]
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure, to set aside the impugned
docket order dated 07.08.2021 issuing Non-Bailable Warrant
against the petitioner herein passed in C.C.No.2997 of 2021 on
the file of the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore,
Chennai.
For Petitioner :
Mr.M.Deivanandam
For R1
:
Mr.E.Raj Thilak,
Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to set
aside the impugned docket order, dated 07.08.2021 issuing Non-
Bailable Warrant against the petitioner in C.C.No.2997 of 2021
by the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai
(trial Court).
2.The learned counsel for the petitioner/A1 submitted
that the petitioner is the estranged husband of the 2nd
respondent. A2 and A3 are the parents of the petitioner. The
marriage between the petitioner and the 2nd respondent had
taken place on 23.11.2012. The petitioner is a Technocrat and
he got employment in USA and went to USA during the month of
January 2018. Thereafter, the 2nd respondent joined the
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
petitioner in USA on 03.12.2018 and later, the 2nd respondent
came back to India and made allegation that she was forcibly
sent back by the petitioner by demanding dowry. However,
H.M.O.P.No.216 of 2019 was filed by the petitioner before the
Family Court, Nagercoil on the ground of cruelty. The 2nd
respondent has filed H.M.O.P.No.618 of 2019 before the
Subordinate Court, Poondhamallee for restitution of conjugal
rights. Now, both the cases have been transferred and pending
before the learned I Additional Family Judge, Chennai and
renumbered as H.M.O.P.Nos.2236 and 2238 of 2021.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioner further
submitted that earlier to the registration of FIR, on
24.01.2020, the 1st respondent Police contacted the petitioner
in USA and enquired with regard to the matrimonial dispute.
Later, the petitioner came to know that the First Information
Report was registered on 21.02.2021 against him for offense,
punishable under Sections 498A and 406 of IPC and Section 4 of
the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner's parents A2 and A3
obtained anticipatory bail on 13.05.2021. The petitioner not
filed any anticipatory bail, since he was in USA. On
completion of investigation, charge sheet was filed against
all the three accused before the learned Chief Metropolitan
Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai and the same was taken on file as
C.C.No.2997 of 2021. The trial Court issued summons were
served to the parents of the petitioner viz., A2 and A3 and
with regard to the petitioner, the summon could not be served,
since he was in USA. On 07.08.2021, A2 and A3 appeared before
the trial Court and their counsel filed Memo of Appearance for
them. As regards the petitioner is concerned, since he was in
USA, summon could not be served to him and he did not appear
for trial and hence, a Non-Bailable Warrant was issued against
him on 07.08.2021. The petitioner already planned a trip to
India to appear before the trial Court and to co-operate with
the trial. Due to COVID-19 pandemic, he was unable to return
back immediately from work place. In the meanwhile, the
petitioner came to know that on the request of the Deputy
Commissioner of Police, Anna Nagar District, Chennai, a Look
Out Circular was issued in suspect No.From 2141718 to 2141718
on 22.02.2021