MADRAS HIGH COURT
M/S.P.JESYGAA, PROPRIETRIX JVKDS ENTERPRISES – Appellant
Versus
MR.S.MOHAMMED FAROOK AND 5 OTHERS – Respondent
Application No.3884 of 2021
in
C.S.No.866 of 2018
(Commercial Division)
N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.
This application has been filed to substitute the witness PW-1 and for
eschewing the evidence given by one Mr.P.Kumar as PW-1 and to permit the applicant to
mark the documents afresh.
2.It was brought to the notice of this Court that there are several suits pending
between the same parties. In some of the suits similar application was filed. This Court on
considering the grievance expressed by the applicant/plaintiff, allowed the application by
providing sufficient safeguards. Useful reference can be made to the order passed in one
such application in A.No.3813 of 2021 in C.S.(Comm.Div) No.200 of 2019, dated 26.10.2021.
3.In view of the above, this application stands allowed. Accordingly, the
evidence of Mr.P.Kumar examined as PW-1 is eschewed. The Proprietrix is permitted to be
examined as PW-1 afresh. Insofar as the documents are concerned, the learned Additional
Master while recording the evidence will ensure that original documents are marked and it will
be subject to relevancy, admissibility and proof. It shall also be ensured that the document
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.