SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MADRAS HIGH COURT
M/S.P.JESYGAA, PROPRIETRIX JVKDS ENTERPRISES – Appellant
Versus
MR.S.MOHAMMED FAROOK AND 5 OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/s Waraon', 'Sai Rams', '', 'P NEETHI KUMAR-MS/']

Application No.3884 of 2021

in

C.S.No.866 of 2018

(Commercial Division)

N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.

This application has been filed to substitute the witness PW-1 and for

eschewing the evidence given by one Mr.P.Kumar as PW-1 and to permit the applicant to

mark the documents afresh.

2.It was brought to the notice of this Court that there are several suits pending

between the same parties. In some of the suits similar application was filed. This Court on

considering the grievance expressed by the applicant/plaintiff, allowed the application by

providing sufficient safeguards. Useful reference can be made to the order passed in one

such application in A.No.3813 of 2021 in C.S.(Comm.Div) No.200 of 2019, dated 26.10.2021.

3.In view of the above, this application stands allowed. Accordingly, the

evidence of Mr.P.Kumar examined as PW-1 is eschewed. The Proprietrix is permitted to be

examined as PW-1 afresh. Insofar as the documents are concerned, the learned Additional

Master while recording the evidence will ensure that original documents are marked and it will

be subject to relevancy, admissibility and proof. It shall also be ensured that the document

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top