SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
THE UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
SREE RAJENDRA MILLS LTD – Respondent
WA 2715/2002



Advocates:
['M/S MEERA GUPTA', '', 'ACGSC', 'COPIES OF TYPED SETS FILEDBY', 'M/S A KALAISELVAN', 'SR PANEL COUNSEL', 'S UDAYAKUMAR', 'ONE COPY OF GROUNDS DUE', '', 'IN WA']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 15.07.2010

CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE R.BANUMATHI

and

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN

W.A.No.2715 of 2002, W.P.Nos.16749/03, 33944, 44044 of 2002, 716,

893, 2110, 2989, 3344 of 2003

AND W.A.M.P.No.4603 of 2002

W.A.No.2715 of 2002:

1.The Union of India,

represented by its Secretary

Ministry of Textiles

New Delhi

2.The Regional Office of the

Textile Commissioner,

Coimbatore

represented by its Enforcement Inspector

Shri D.Ravikumar

....

Appellants/Respondents 1 & 2

Vs.

1.Sree Rajendra Mills Ltd.,

Leigh Bazaar

Salem – 636 009

.... 1st Respondent/Petitioner

2.The State of Tamilnadu

represented by Secretary to

Government, Handloom Handicrafts

Textiles & Khadi Department,

Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009. 2nd Respondent/3rd Respondent

Writ Appeal filed under clause 15 of Letters patent against

the orders of this Court dated 29.7.2002 made in WP.No.30174/2002

on the file of this Court.

WP.No.30174/2002: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of

the Constitution of India, for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified

mandamus calling for the records of the first respondent and quash

the impugned notice threatening legal action and consequently

direct the respondent not to insist the petitioner to fulfil the

Land yarn obligation.

Uma Maheswari Mills Ltd.,

rep by its Chairman,

SIPCOT Industrial Complex,

Post Box No.10,

Hosur 635 126.

...Petitioner in WP.16749/03

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Salem Textiles Ltd.,

rep by its General Manager,

Sellianpalayam,

Narasingapuram 636 108.

Attur Taluk, Salem District.

...Petitioner in WP.33944/02

Sree Uma Parameswari Mills Ltd;

5/119, II Street,

State Bank Colony,

No.4, Salem 636 004

rep by its Chairman.

...Petitioner in WP.44044/02

Sree Rajendra Mills Ltd.,

Leign Bazaar,

Salem.

...Petitioner in WP.716/03

Kongarar Spinners Ltd.,

Pethupanpatti 642 205,

Udumalet Taluk,

Coimbatore District.

...Petitioner in WP.893/03

Sri Balasubramania Mills Ltd.,

Uppilipalayam P.O.,

Coimbatore 641 015.

...Petitioner in WP.2110/03

Gem Spinners India Ltd.,

14, Mangalam Village,

Maduranthagam Taluk,

Kancheepuram District 603 107

rep by its Manager

...Petitioner in WP.2989/03

Sarvaraya Textiles Ltd.,

rep by its Managing Director,

45, Dr. P.V. Cherian Gesant,

Chennai 600 008.

...Petitioner in WP.3344/03

The Textile Commissioner

Post Bag No.11500

Mumbai 400 020.

..Ist Respondent in WP.No.16749/03

33944/02, 44044/02, 893/03,

2110/03, 3344/03 and 2989/03

The Director Regional Office

of Textile Commissioner,

1254-1255, Mettupalayam Road,

Coimbatore 641 043.

2nd Respondent in WP.No.16749/03,

893/03, 44044/02, 2110/03, 2989/03

and 3344/03

The Assistant Director,

Regional Office of Textile Commissioner,

1254, Mettupalayam Road,

Coimbatore 641 043.

2nd Respondent in WP.No.33944/03

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

The Union of India,

rep by its Secretary,

Ministry of Textiles,

New Delhi.

The Regional Office of the Textile Commissioner,

Coimbatore rep by its Enforcement Inspector,

D.Ravikumar.

The State of Tamilnadu,

rep by Secretary to Government,

Handloom Handicrafts Textiles & Khadi Department,

Fort St George, Chennai.

...Respondents in WP.No.716/03

Prayer in W.P.Nos.16749/03, 33944, 44044/02, 893/03, 2110/03,

2989/03 & 3344/03

Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of

India to issue a writ of Certiorari Mandamus to call for the 1st

Respondent in order/Notification No.16/TDRO/8/1/2000/76 dated

31.3.2000 quash Clause 10 thereof and consequently for bear the

respondents from taking any action against the petitioner for non-

compliance with the said Notification.

Prayer in W.P.No.716/2003:

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of

India to issue a writ of Declaration declaring the provision Rule

10 (1) of Hank Yarn packing Notification in No.16/TDRO/8/1/2000/76

dated 31.3.2000 as unconstitutional, illegal ultra virus and

violative of Articles 14 &

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top