HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.Ganesan – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
WP 25195/2019
['M/s Vedavallikumar', '', 'VISHNUPRIYA UPENDRAN', 'A V S MADHUSUDHAN', 'K Aswini']
W.P.No.25195 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :26.08.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN
W.P.No.25195 of 2019
1.K.Ganesan
2.John B.S.Demel
3.R.Rajendran
4.R.Swaminathan
5.G.Gomathinayagam
6.P.Paulraj
7.R.Radhakrishnan
8.A.Nagaraju
9.R.Venkatesan
10.S.K.Sheik Abdul Sathar
11.N.Nachiappan
12.S.Bharathan
13.R.Sekar
14.K.Manogar
15.L.Sivalingam
16.M.Issac Daniel
17.M.Thiagarajan
18.P.C.Sahu
19.S.Madhavan
20.M.Sankarasubramanian
21.P.Alfred Samraj Robertson
22.S.Hariharan
23.M.Jeyabalan
24.K.Gomathinayagam
25.P.Rajendran
26.R.Ramakrishnan
27.G.Kumaravel
28.A.Vikraman
29.C.Perumal Pillai
30.I.Azeez
31.S.Sankaranarayanan
32.R.Gopal
33.Alagappan
... Petitioners
Vs.
1/7
http://www.judis.nic.in
W.P.No.25195 of 2019
1.Union of India
Represented by the Secretary to Government of India
Ministry of Labour and Department of Employment
New Delhi – 110 001.
2.Regional PF Commissioner – I (Pension),
Office of the Employees Provident Fund
Organisation (EPFO)
Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan
No.14, Bhikanji Cama Palace,
New Delhi – 110 066.
3.Addl. Central PF Commissioner – HQ (Pension),
Office of the Emplioyees Provident Fund
Organisation (EPFO)
Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan,
No.14, Bhikanji Cama Palace,
New Delhi – 110 066.
4.Regional Provident Fund Commissioner,
Office of the Employees Provident Fund
Organisation (EPFO),
Bhavishya Nidhi Bhavan,
No.37, Royapettah High Road,
Azad Nagar, Royapettah,
Chennai 600 014,
Tamil Nadu.
5.Regional Provident Fund Commissioner,
Office of the Employees Provident Fund
Organisation (EPFO),
Bhavishya Nidhi Bhavan,
NGO “B” Colony,
Thirunelveli – 627 007,
Tamil Nadu.
6.Secretary
M/s.Southern Petrochemical Industries
Corporation Limited (SPIC),
88, Mount Road, Guindy,
Chennai – 600 032.
... Respondents
2/7
http://www.judis.nic.in
W.P.No.25195 of 2019
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 5th
respondent to receive the net amounts receivable by them towards
refund of provident fund amounts received and allow the petitioner
to receive their respective pensions based on their actual salary as
directed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in its Judgment dated
31.03.2016 and 16.03.2017 read with approval of the Ministry of
Labour and Employment dated 16.03.2017 and the circular of the
2nd respondent dated 23.03.2017.
For Petitioners
: Mr.Vedavallikumar
For RR 1 to 5
: Mr.T.R.Sundaram
Standing Counsel
ORDER
In a batch of Writ Petitions, similar to the present Writ
Petitions, in W.P.No.14368 of 2018, etc., this Court, by order dated
27.03.2019, passed detailed directions in para 48 and allowed all
the Writ Petitions in para 49, which are extracted as under:
"48.In
the
above
mentioned
circumstances, this Court consider the following
directions as expedient to resolve the issues as
projected in the Writ Petitions.
i) Both the employees of the exempted
and unexempted establishments are
entitled to the benefit of enhanced
pension on the basis of their
contribution with reference to actual
salary received by them to their
Provident Fund accounts;
3/7
http://www.judis.nic.in
W.P.No.25195 of 2019
ii) The cut off date as prescribed i.e.
01.12.2004 is invalid in law and
therefore, the same is held to be
illegal and invalid;
iii) The employees, namely, the writ
petitioners shall be permitted to
exercise their option in terms of
Proviso to Clause 11(3) of the
Pension Scheme and while permitting
so, the EPFO is at liberty to seek
return of the higher Provident Fund
contribution
received
by
the
respective employees with simple
interest at the rate of 6% p.a. from
the date of receipt of Provident Fund
amount and till the date of payment;
iv) The amounts to be refunded by the
employees con