SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

MADRAS HIGH COURT
K.KARTHIKEYAN, AGED 45 YEARS – Appellant
Versus
FOOD SAFETY OFFICER – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S R NALLIYAPPAN', 'PRIVATE NOTICE PERMITTED', '', 'PROOF NOT FILED ON RESPONDENT', 'ADDL TYPED SET FILED']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATE: 16.11.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATISH KUMAR

Crl.O.P.No. 4839 of 2017

and

Crl.M.P.Nos.3609 and 3610 of 2017

1.K.Karthikeyan

2.M.Kannupaiyan ...Petitioners/ Accused

Versus

Food Saftey Officer,

Suramangalam Zone - I,

Food Safety and Drug Administrative Department,

Food Safety Division.

Old Nattanmani Building,

Salem - 636 001.

... Respondent/Complainant

Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C

to call for the records with respect to the complaint filed by

the respondent herein in S.T.C.No.613/2016 on the file of the

Judicial Magistrate III, Salem.

For Petitioners : Mr.R.Nalliyappan

For Respondent : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar.

Government Advocate (Crl.side)

ORDER

This petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in

S.T.C.No.613/2016 based on the complaint filed by the Food

Safety Officer for the offences under Sections 48 and 59(1) of

Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.

2. Heard the learned counsel for petitioners and the

learned counsel for respondent.

3. The main contention of the learned counsel for

petitioners is that there i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top