SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

M/S SHEVDH, A PARTNERSHIP FIRM – Appellant
Versus
M/S SHARADDHA ENTERTAINMENT – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S VIJAYAN SUBRAMANIAN', '', 'm v Bhaskar', 'n c narindra adithyan', 'M/S RUGAN AND ARYA', '', 'CAVEATOR', 'IN ALL CASES']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 31.01.2020

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN

C.M.A.Nos.3656, 3657 & 3659 of 2019

and

C.M.P.Nos.20960, 20963 & 20970 of 2019

M/s.Shvedh, a Partnership Firm,

Represented by its Partner

Nitinsathyaa,

No.29, Bawa Road,

Abhiramapuram,

Chennai – 600 018.

... Appellant in all C.M.As

Vs.

M/s.Shraddha Entertainment,

Represented by its Partner

Mr.Badri Kasturi,

No.2, Seaface Road,

Palavakkam,

Chennai – 600 041.

... Respondent in all C.M.As

Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are filed under Order 37(2) of

the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, against the common

order dated 16.09.2019 in A.Nos.1 to 3 of 2019 in O.P.No.573 of

2019 (hereinafter, referred to as the 'Impugned Order') passed

by the Sole Arbitrator.

For Appellant : Mr.Sathish Parasaran

Senior Counsel

For Mr.Vijayan Subramanian

For Respondent : M/s.Rugan & Arya

Judgment

Today, i.e. on 31.01.2020, when the matter is taken up for

pronouncing Judgment, the learned counsel for the respondent

represented before this Court that the matter has been settled

before the Learned Arbitrator. But no order c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top