SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.R. Raju – Appellant
Versus
M/s. Vision Corporation ltd – Respondent
CS 25/2017



Advocates:
['M/S PL NARAYANAN', '', 'P T RAKESH', 'M/S K SUMATHI', '', 'FOR DEFT -D NO', 'N KALIDOSS', 'B SARANYA', 'KAVITHA KUMAR']

C.S.(Comm.Suits) No.25 of 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 28.02.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR

RAMAMOORTHY

C.S.(Comm.Suits) No.25 of 2017

G.R.Raju,

Proprietor of Vijay Vision,

T-3-4, Jains Cresent Park, Phase-II,

12, Rathinammal Street,

Rangarajapuram, Kodambakkam,

Chennai - 600 024.

... Plaintiff

vs.

M/s.Vision Corporation Ltd,

Represented by its Managing Director,

No-2/A, 2nd Floor,

Citi Mall,

New LinkRoad, Andheri(W),

Mumbai-53.

... Defendant

PRAYER: Plaint filed under Sections 55 and 62 of Copyright Act, 1955,

Read with Order IV Rule 1 of O.S.Rules and Order VII Rule 1 of C.P.C.,

prayed for Judgment and Decree:-

1/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.S.(Comm.Suits) No.25 of 2017

(a) for the relief of declaration declaring that the plaintiff is the

absolute copy right owner in the suit pictures more fully described in the

schedule hereunder having the rights of distribution, exhibition, exploitation

rights, for the territories of entire world, media rights and including Satellite

Television Rights including DTH Via Cabel TV, Subscription Television and

pay Television rights, Pay Per View, Pay Per Day, Internet Via Cable,

Website and Broadband Rights.

(b) granting permanent injunction restraining the defendant, their

agents, servants, each and every person or persons claiming through the

defendant either directly or indirectly from in any manner dealing with,

interfering or infringing the plaintiff's copy right in the suit pictures more

fully described in the schedule hereunder for the territories of entire world,

media rights and including Satellite Television Rights including DTH Via

Cable TV, Subscription Television and pay Television rights, Pay Per View,

Pay Per Day, Internet Via Cable, Website and Broadband Rigths.

(c) the costs of the suit.

2/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.S.(Comm.Suits) No.25 of 2017

For Plaintiff

: M/s.PL.Narayanan

For Defendant

: M/s.K.Sumathi

**********

J U D G M E N T

The plaintiff seeks permission to withdraw the suit on the ground the

same was settled amicably out of Court. The memo dated 20.11.2021 has

been filed in such regard.

2. By recording the same, C.S.(Comm.Suits) No.25 of 2017 is

dismissed as withdrawn. There will be no order as to costs.

28.02.2022

rna

Index : Yes / No

Internet : Yes / No

3/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.S.(Comm.Suits) No.25 of 2017

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J

rna

C.S.(Comm.Suits) No.25 of 2017

28.02.2022

4/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top