V.SARAVANAN – Appellant
Versus
DHANALAKSHMI @ GAYATHRI – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 12.02.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
C.M.A.No.2721 of 2017
and
C.M.P.No.15279 of 2017
V.Saravanan
..Appellant /Respondent/Respondent
.Vs.
Dhanalakshmi @ Gayathri
..Respondent/Petitioner/Petitioner
Appeal filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984
against the order dated 20.07.2017 in I.A.No.55 of 2016 in
H.M.O.P.No.36 of 2015 on the file of the Family Court,
Thiruvallur.
For Appellant
:
Mr.R.Dhamodaran
For Respondent :
No appearance
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.)
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant. As
there was no representation on behalf of the respondent on the
earlier occasion, we have posted the matter today.
Unfortunately, even today, there is no representation on her
behalf.
2.The respondent filed a petition for restitution of
conjugal rights in H.M.O.P.No.36 of 2015. Pending the said
petition, she sought for interim maintenance under Section 24 of
the Hindu Marriage Act. The Family Court awarded a sum of
Rs.3,000/- per month toward
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.