HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M/S. HINDUSTAN MARINE – Appellant
Versus
THE CHIEF CONTROLLING REVENUE – Respondent
CMA 371/2017
['M/S R C PAULKANAGARAJ', '', 'M SOUNDAR VIJAY ARUL', 'T PREM KUMAR', 'M/S T M PAPPIAH', '', 'SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER', 'FOR RR AND', 'R THE SUB-REGISTRAR', 'RADHAPURAM']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Reserved on : 29.01.2019
Delivered on : 08.02.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.371 of 2017
and
CMP.Nos.2593 and 4501 of 2017
M/s.Hindustan Marine Industries,
rep. by its Proprietor M.K.Balraj,
D.No.12-42A, Fishing Industrial Area,
Udayavara – 574 118,
Udipi, Karnataka.
... Appellant
Vs
1.The Chief Controlling Revenue Authority (Stamps),
The Inspector General of Registration,
100, Santhome High Road,
Chennai – 600 028.
2.The Special Deputy Collector (Stamps),
Thirunelveli.
3.The Sub Registrar,
Radhapuram,
Thirunelveli Registration District,
Thirunelveli.
... Respondents
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Order 41, Rule 2 CPC read
with Section 47-A of the Indian Stamp Act against the order
dated 08.12.2016 passed by the first respondent in
Na.Ka.No.7909/N4/2016.
For Appellant
:
Mr.R.C.Paulkanagaraj
For Respondents
:
Mr.T.M.Pappiah
Spl. G.P. for R1 & R2
R3 - No Appearance
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
JUDGMENT
This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed by the
appellant against the order dated 08.12.2016 passed by the first
respondent fixing the value at Rs.1,020/- in respect of the
building measuring an extent of 666 square metre situated in
S.No.252/1 and the remaining lands situated in S.No.249/2A, 2B,
259/3, 252/1 and 252/2 at Rs.10,12,200/- per acre.
2. The case of appellant is as follows:
The appellant is carrying on business in manufacture of fish
meal and fish oil in Udupi, Karnataka State and Gujarat
respectively. With a view to start factory in Tamil Nadu, the
appellant had purchased lands situated in Vijayapathi Village,
Radhapuram Taluk, Thirunelveli District in S.Nos.249/2A
measuring 0.09 Acre; S.No.249/2B measuring 3.99 Acres;
S.No.252/1 measuring 5.80 Acres; S.No.252/2 measuring 0.12 Acre
and S.No.259/3 measuring 1.51 Acre in all 11.51 Acres for a
total sale consideration of Rs.35,00,000/-. The total extent of
land purchased by the appellant is 11.51 Acres, which is a dry
manavari punja land, wherein a factory building admeasuring 380
sq. mts. was situate on one side and the remaining extent of
land was dry vacant land. The factory building is nearly seven
years old and no machinery is available therein and the factory
building has become defunct and even the electricity service
connection has been served by the TNEB.
3. According to the appellant, the sale deed was registered
on the file of the third respondent as Document No.1562 of 2015.
The lands were valued at Rs.4,00,000/- per hectare and the
building was valued at Rs.16,36,000/- and the appellant had paid
stamp duty and stamp charges as per the guideline value. But
the third respondent without any reason refused to return the
sale deed bearing Document No.1562/2015 and fixed the value at
Rs.1,700/- per sq. mt. and sent it to the second respondent
under Section 47-A(1) of the Indian Stamp Act.
4. By the order dated 04.02.2016. the second respondent
without any valid reasons fixed the value of the property at
Rs.5,09,61,617/-. Aggrieved by the said order, the appellant
had filed an appeal to the first respondent. By the impugned
order dated 08.12.2016, the first respondent fixed the value at
Rs.1,020/- in respect of the building measuring an extent of 666
square metre situated in S.No.252/1 and the remaining lands
situated in S.No.249/2A, 2B, 259/3, 252/1 and 252/2 at
Rs.10,12,200/- per acre. Challenging the same, the appellant
has filed the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.
5. Resisting the appeal, the second respondent filed counter
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
stating that since Document No.1562 of 2015 has been executed
without following the guideline value and bearing lesser stamp
duty, the same was referred to the second respondent to
ascertain the value of the