SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MADRAS HIGH COURT
SMT. POOVATHAL (DIED) – Appellant
Versus
RUKUMANI – Respondent
CRP 622/2017



Advocates:
['M/S N S SIVAKUMAR', 'M/S C PRAKASAM', '', 'AOS NOT FOUND', '', 'PVT NOTICE', 'RR & - PERSON NOT FOUND', 'RR TO - DOOR LOCKED', 'R- KUMARI W/O VELUSWAMY', 'R- SHANTHI W/O BALASUBRAMANIAM', 'R- VELUSAMY S/O RAMASAMY', 'R- RAJESWARI W/O BALASUBRAMANIAM', 'R- RAVIKUMAR S/O PALANISAMY', 'R- JEGANATHAN S/O PALANISAMY', 'R- MALLIKA W/O DEIVASIGAMANI', 'R- RASAPPA GOUNDER @ KUMARASAMY', 'COUNSEL', 'FOR R']

C.R.P. No. 622 of 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 08.11.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI

C.R.P.No. 622 of 2017

and

C.M.P. No. 3182 of 2017

Smt. Poovathal (died)

1. Kannammal,

W/o. Late Ramasamy

2. Arukkathal,

W/o. Late Palanisamy

... Petitioners

Versus

1. Rukmani,

W/o. Karuppasamy

Ammaiammal (died)

2. Rasappa Gounder @ Kumarasamy,

S/o. Avinashi Gounder

3. K.Palanisamy,

S/o. Kumarasamy

4. Mallika,

W/o. Deivasigamani

1/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.R.P. No. 622 of 2017

5. Shanthi,

W/o. Kumar

6. Balasubramaniam,

S/o. Ramasamy

7. Kumarasamy,

S/o. Ramasamy

8. Meganathan @ Nathan,

S/o. Ramasamy

9. Dhanalakshmi,

W/o. Velusamy

10. Jaganathan,

S/o. Palanisamy

11. Ravikumar,

S/o. Palanisamy

12. Rajeswari,

W/o. Balasubramaniam

13. Velusamy,

S/o. Ramasamy

14. Shanthi,

W/o. Balasubramaniam

15. Kumar,

W/o. Velusamy

... Respondents

2/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.R.P. No. 622 of 2017

PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Art. 227 of Constitution

of India, praying to set aside the fair and final order dated 21.12.2016 made

in I.A.No. 1142 of 2016 in O.S.No. 218 of 2013 on the file of II Addl.

District and Sessions Judge, Tiruppur.

For Petitioners

: Mr.N.S.Sivakumar

For Respondents

: Mr.C.Prakasam for R1

R2, R4, R10 to R15

– No appearance

R6 to R8 – Door locked

R3 & R9 – Person not found

O R D E R

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed seeking to set aside the

fair and final order dated 21.12.2016 made in I.A.No. 1142 of 2016 in

O.S.No. 218 of 2013 on the file of II Addl. District and Sessions Judge,

Tiruppur.

2. Today, when the matter taken up for hearing, the learned counsel

for petitioners herein submitted that as per e-court status, suit itself got

3/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.R.P. No. 622 of 2017

disposed of on 01.09.2017 and he has also made endorsement to that effect.

So, the relief claimed in this Civil Revision Petition became infructuous and

the same may be dismissed as infructuous.

3. In view of the submission made by the learned Counsel appearing

for the Revision Petitioners, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as

infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected Civil Miscellaneous

Petition is also closed.

08.11.2022

Index : Yes/No

Internet: Yes/No

Speaking/Non Speaking order

rpp

To

II Addl. District and Sessions Judge,

Tiruppur.

4/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.R.P. No. 622 of 2017

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

rpp

C.R.P.No. 622 of 2017

08.11.2022

5/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top