SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
J.MEENA – Appellant
Versus
T.MANIKANDAN – Respondent
CMA 2821/2018



Advocates:
['SANTHAKUMARI K', '', 'D AROKIA MARY SOPHIA', 'M BHUVANISWARI', 'm/s bfs legal', '', 'p v balasubramaniam', 'd ferdinand', 'k m aasim shehzad', 'soundaryanarayanakumar', 'vijay gurudass', 'g arbaham', 'sidhartha vishnu']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

Friday, the Twenty Fifth day of January Two Thousand Nineteen

PRESENT

THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN

and

THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

CMA Nos.2821 and 2822 of 2018

and CMP Nos.21521 & 21550 of 2018

J.MEENA [ APPELLANT IN BOTH THE APPEALS ]

Vs

T.MANIKANDAN [ RESPONDENT IN BOTH THE APPEALS]

Appeal against the judement and decree dated 30.08.2018

passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai

allowing the O.P.4230/2014 and granting a decree of divorce(in

CMA.2821/2018);

(2) Appeal against the judement and decree dated 30.08.2018

passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai

allowing the G.W.O.P. No.4650/2014 (in CMA.2822/2018);

(3) To stay the operation of the decree Judgment dated

30.08.2018 passed by the Learned Principal Judge, Family Court,

Chennai in O.P.No.4230/2014 (in CMP.21521/2018) and

(4) To stay the operation of the decree Judgment dated

30.08.2018 passed in GWOP No.4650/2014 to the extent the Learned

trail judge has directed the respondent herein to file a petition

for production of the child to ascertain wishes of the child in the

month of March 2019 and that the further custody of the child will

be decided based on the wishes of the child (in CMP.21550/2018)

respectively pending CMA Nos.2821 & 2822 of 2018.

Order :These appeals coming on for orders upon perusing

the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon

hearing the arguments of SANTHAKUMARI K., Advocate for the

appellant in both the appeals and of MR.D.FERDINAND for M/S.BFS

LEGAL on behalf of the Respondents in both the appeals the court

made the following order:-

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

(Order of the Court was made by N. KIRUBAKARAN,J.)

It is agreed between the parties that the husband would take

the child from the residence of the wife, either on Saturday or on

Sunday, as the case may be, in the morning at 10a.m and return the

child to the wife in the evening by 6p.m. on the same day.

This interim arrangement shall continue until further orders.

2.

Post on 25.02.2019.

-sd/-

25/01/2019

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar ( Statistics / C.S. )

High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO

1 THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE

FAMILY COURT, CHENNAI.

C.C. to SANTHAKUMARI K. Advocate on payment of necessary

charges

Order

in

CMA Nos.2821 and 2822 of 2018

and CMP Nos.21521 & 21550 of 2018

Date :25/01/2019

From 26.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified

copies of the Interim Orders in this format

VS 22.01.2019 (P)

RRI 01/02/2019

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top