SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

J.MEENA – Appellant
Versus
T.MANIKANDAN – Respondent


Advocates:
['SANTHAKUMARI K', '', 'D AROKIA MARY SOPHIA', 'M BHUVANISWARI', 'm/s bfs legal', '', 'p v balasubramaniam', 'd ferdinand', 'k m aasim shehzad', 'soundaryanarayanakumar', 'vijay gurudass', 'g arbaham', 'sidhartha vishnu']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

Friday, the Twenty Fifth day of January Two Thousand Nineteen

PRESENT

THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN

and

THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

CMA Nos.2821 and 2822 of 2018

and CMP Nos.21521 & 21550 of 2018

J.MEENA [ APPELLANT IN BOTH THE APPEALS ]

Vs

T.MANIKANDAN [ RESPONDENT IN BOTH THE APPEALS]

Appeal against the judement and decree dated 30.08.2018

passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai

allowing the O.P.4230/2014 and granting a decree of divorce(in

CMA.2821/2018);

(2) Appeal against the judement and decree dated 30.08.2018

passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai

allowing the G.W.O.P. No.4650/2014 (in CMA.2822/2018);

(3) To stay the operation of the decree Judgment dated

30.08.2018 passed by the Learned Principal Judge, Family Court,

Chennai in O.P.No.4230/2014 (in CMP.21521/2018) and

(4) To stay the operation of the decree Judgment dated

30.08.2018 passed in GWOP No.4650/2014 to the extent the Learned

trail judge has directed the respondent herein to file a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top