MADRAS HIGH COURT
P Sundaravaradhan – Appellant
Versus
A Rajagopalan – Respondent
WRIT PETITION 31778/2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :24.01.2019
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.31778 of 2018
and
W.M.P.No.37016 of 2018
Mr.P.Sundaravaradhan
..Petitioner
vs
1. The Assistant Executive Engineer
O & M, West Mambalam
C.E.D.C.Central Chennai,
No.14, K.R.Koil Street, West Mambalam
Chennai – 600 033
2. Mr.A.Rajagopalan
..Respondents
Prayer:
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus,
calling for the records of the 1st respondent pertaining to
j/vz;/ c/br/bgh-nkh/kh? I-nfh-m/vz; :327/2018 dated 11.10.2018 and quash
the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to provide
electricity service connection to the petitioner tenanted
premises at First floor, Old No.15, New No.43, Arya Gowda Road,
West Mambalam, Chennai – 600 033.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Vijayakumar
For Respondents
: Mr.P.R.Dhilipkumar,
Standing counsel for TNEB
No appearance for R2
O R D E R
The order of rejection dated 11.10.2018, rejecting the claim
of the writ petitioner for providing a separate Electricity
Service Connection, wherein the writ petitioner is continuing as
a tenant is under challenge in the present writ petition.
2.The writ petitioner states that he is a tenant as First
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Floor, Old No.15, New No.43, Arya Gowda Road, West Mambalam,
Chennai – 600 033 under one Mrs.Kamala.
3.The grievances of the writ petitioner is that the arrears
of Electricity Consumption Charges had not been cleared by the
landlord despite the fact that the petitioner is paying the rent
promptly to the landlord. In other words, the landlord had
failed to pay the arrears of Electricity Consumption Charges and
on account of the lapses on the part of the landlord, the
Electricity Service Connection provided to the writ petitioner
was disconnected. Thus, the petitioner is constrained to move
the present writ petition.
4.The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the writ
petitioner now made a submission that the writ petitioner is
ready and willing to clear the entire arrears of Current
Consumption Charges without prejudice his rights to claim the
same from the landlord in accordance with law and in the event
of clearing the arrears of Consumption Charges, the case of the
writ petitioner shall be considered for providing a separate
Electricity Service Connection in respect of the premises
occupied by the writ petitioner as a tenant.
5.In view of the undertaking given by the learned counsel
for the writ petitioner, this Court is inclined to pass an
order, permitting the writ petitioner to deposit the entire
arrears of Current Consumption Charges to the Respondent Board
and on payment of the arrears of Current Consumption Charges by
the writ petitioner, the 1st respondent is directed to consider
the case of the writ petitioner for providing a electricity
service connection, if the writ petitioner is otherwise eligible
and by following the procedures as contemplated under the Tamil
Nadu Electricity Supply Code and the Tamil Nadu Electricity
Distribution Code.
6.With these directions, the writ petition stands disposed
of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently,
connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CCC)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
kak
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
To
1. The Assistant Executive Engineer
O & M, West Mambalam
C.E.D.C.Central Chennai,
No.14, K.R.Koil Street, West Mambalam
Chennai – 600 033
+1cc to Mr.G.Vijayakumar, Advocate, S.R.No.5426
+1cc to Mr.P.R.Dhilipkumar, Advocate, S.R.No.6134
W.P.No.31778 of 2018
NRL(CO)
CS/11/02/2019
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.