SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
THE BRANCH MANAGER – Appellant
Versus
VEERACHAMY, – Respondent


JUDGMENT

This appeal has been filed against the decree and judgment dated 27.09.2016 made in MCOP.No.64 of 2014 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Additional District Judge and Special Judge of Pudukottai.

2.In an accident which occurred on 03.11.2013, the 1st respondent/claimant sustained fracture of ulna bone in the right hand and fibula bone in the left leg and injuries on head and face. The claimant laid a claim in MCOP.No.64 of 2014 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Additional District Judge and https://hcSseprveiccesi.ecaoulrts.g ov.inJ/hucsdergvicees/ of Pudukottai, claiming compensation of Rs.10,00,000/-. The appellant insurance company disputed the age, avocation, income of the claimant and the compensation claimed under various heads. Considering the oral and documentary evidence adduced on either side, the Tribunal directed the appellant who is the insurer of the offending vehicle to pay compensation of Rs.5,00,800/- with 7.5% interest per annum. Aggrieved by the said award, the appellant has filed this appeal challenging quantum of compensation.

3.Learned counsel for the appellant would contend that the Tribunal has erred in applying multiplie

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top