SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mrs Justice R. THARANI
MR.G.SURESH – Appellant
Versus
THE MANAGER – Respondent
CMA(MD)/698/2013



C.M.A.(MD)No.698 of 2013

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

Dated :04.08.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. THARANI

C.M.A.(MD)No.698 of 2013

G.Suresh

...Appellant/Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Manager,

Apex Viswa Engineering Service,

103, B.S.Sivasamy Road,

Mylapore,

Chennai.

2.The Manager,

National Insurance Company Limited,

Chennai Divisional Office-7,

35/18, North Usman Road,

Chennai – 17.

...Respondents/Respondents

Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 30 of

Workmen Compensation Act, 1923, to set aside the judgment and decree

dated 25.02.2010, passed in W.C.No.369 of 2005 on the file of the

Commissioner of Workmen Compensation cum Deputy Commissioner of

Labour, Dindigul.

For Appellant

: No Appearance

For 2nd Respondent

: Mr.S.Srinivasa Raghavan

For 1st Respondent

: No Appearance

JUDGMENT

It is seen from the records that this appeal is pending from

the year 2013 onwards and when the matter is placed before this

Court on 16.04.2021, 27.04.2021, 19.06.2021, 21.06.2021, 28.06.2021,

12.07.2021 and 02.08.2021, there was no representation on the side

of the appellant. Even today, when the case was posted under the

caption “for arguments or for orders”, there was no representation

on the side of the appellant. The second respondent is ready for

1 / 2

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

C.M.A.(MD)No.698 of 2013

arguments. There is no use in keeping the appeal pending any

further. Hence, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for

default. No Costs.

Sd/-

Assistant Registrar (CS III)

// True Copy //

/ /2021

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

Mrn

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID – 19

pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for

official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order

that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the

responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

To

1.The Deputy Commissioner of Labour(Commissioner for Workmen

Compensation),

Dindigul.

2.The Section Officer,

V.R. Section,

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai.

+1 CC to M/s.S.SRINIVASA RAGHAVAN, Advocate ( SR-25265[F] dated

04/08/2021 )

C.M.A.(MD)No.698 of 2013

04.08.2021

MGJ(06.09.2021) 2P 5C

2 / 2

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top