SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SUDALAI – Appellant
Versus
BALA SUBRAMANIAN – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S A BALAKRISHNAN', '', 'N KARTHIKEYAN', 'M/S S P MAHARAJAN', '', 'C SARAVANAN', 'FOR SOLE RESPONDENT']

CRP(PD)(MD)No.29 of 2021

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED : 08.07.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

CRP(PD)(MD)No.29 of 2021

and C.M.P.(MD)No.359 of 2021

1. Sudalai

2. Muppidathi

3. Velmurugan

... Revision Petitioners

versus

Balasubramanian

... Respondent

Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution

of India, against the fair and decreetal order dated 13.08.2020 passed in

I.A.No.1 of 2019 in O.S.No.47 of 2014 by the Additional District

Munsif, Ambasamuthram.

For Revision Petitioners

: Mr.A.Balakrishnan

For Respondent

: Mr.N.Dilip Kumar

ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order dated

13.08.2020 passed by the learned Additional District Munsif,

1/8

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CRP(PD)(MD)No.29 of 2021

Ambasamuthram, in I.A.No.1 of 2019 in O.S.No.47 of 2014.

2. The revision petitioners are defendants in O.S.No.47 of 2014.

The respondent/plaintiff has filed the above suit for bare injunction,

claiming that he is the owner of the property, pursuant to the sale deed

dated 08.08.1990. The defendants have taken a plea that the sale deed

executed in the year 1990 is not

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top