SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
R.BALAJI – Appellant
Versus
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE – Respondent


COMMON JUDGMENT

M.SATHYANARAYANAN, J.

The appellants in Crl.A.[MD] Nos.237, 241, 243, 244, 249, 250, 253, 258 / 2014 and 59/2015 are arrayed as Accused Nos.14, 1, 3, 16, 15, 17, 12, 4 and 5 respectively, in SC.No.275/2006 on the file of the Court of the Principal Sessions Judge, Thanjavur.

2. The above said appellants were charged for the commission of the following offences:-

Sl.No. Charge No. Accused Nos. Sections
1 1st Charge 1 to 5 304 r/w 120-B IPC [94 counts]
2 2nd Charge 1 to 5 338 IPC [18 counts]
3 3rd Charge 1 to 5 and 19, 20, 21 285 IPC
4 4th Charge 1 to 3, 7 to 10 & 13 to 18 467 r/w 197 IPC
5 5th Charge 1 to 3, 12, 22, 23 465 r/w 197 IPC
6 6th Charge 7 to 10, 12 to 23 304 r/w 120-B r/w 109 IPC
7 7th Charge 7 to 10 & 12 to 23 338 r/w 109 IPC
8 8th Charge 1 to 3 Sec.46 & 47 of Tamil Nadu Recognised Private School [Regulation] Act, 1973
9 9th Charge 1 to 3 & 19, 20, 21 Section 23 of Juvenile Justice [Care and Protection of Children] Act, 2000
10 10th Charge 1 to 3 Sec.320 of Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Act, 1920
https://hcservices.eTcohuertsy.go vw.ine/hcrseerv icceso/ nvicted and sentenced vide Impugned Judgment dated

30.07.2014.as follows:-

S

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top