SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
H.ASIA BEGAM – Appellant
Versus
K.RENGASAMY – Respondent


S.A.(MD).No.904 of 2008

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 22.12.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI

S.A.(MD).No.904 of 2008

1.H.Asia Begam

2.H.Ajeef

3.K.Saleem

4.M.Kamila Banu

5.J.Fathima Begam

6.M.Jasmin Banu

... Appellants

-Vs-

1.K.Rengasamy

2.R.Neelakandan

... Respondents

PRAYER: The Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure

Code, against the judgment and decree dated 29.01.2008 in A.S.No.65 of 2006

on the file of the Principal District Court, Pudukottai, by confirming the judgment

and decree, dated 21.02.2006 passed in O.S.No.251 of 2004, on the file of the

Principal District Munsif Court, Pudukottai.

For Appellants

: Mr.P.Ganapathisubramanian

For Respondents : No appearance

1/10

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

S.A.(MD).No.904 of 2008

J U D G M E N T

The plaintiff Nos.2 to 7, who are the legal heirs of first plaintiff N.K.Haja

Moideen, who have lost both before the trial Court as well as the first appellate

Court, have preferred this second appeal, challenging the judgments of both the

said Courts.

2. The parties are referred to as per their litigative status and ranking

indicated

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top