MADRAS HIGH COURT
Honourable Mr Justice S. VAIDYANATHAN
AATHISIVAM – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
WP(MD)/350/2022
LAND ENCROACHMENT - EVICTION NOTICE - QUASHING - [Section 7 of the Tamilnadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905]
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a writ petition to quash the eviction notice issued by the respondents under Section 7 of the Tamilnadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905, and to grant patta for the land in his possession.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner had illegally encroached upon the government land and constructed a bathroom and compound, and that the electricity service connection to the property should be disconnected.
Issues: Whether the petitioner had illegally encroached upon the government land.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the provisions of Section 7 of the Tamilnadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905, and the judgment of the Division Bench of the Madras High Court in "P.Selvarajan vs. The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Chennai and others" (W.P.No. 21639 of 2017) decided on 13.02.2018, which held that electricity service connections should be disconnected for illegal encroachments.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petition and directed the respondents to remove the encroachment and disconnect the electricity supply to the property.
W.P.(MD) No.350 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 10.01.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
and
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
W.P.(MD)No.350 of 2022
and
WMP(MD)Nos.274 of 2022
Aathisivam
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The District Collector,
Sivagangai District,
Sivagangai.
2.The Tahsildhar,
Thirupathur Taluk,
Sivagangai District.
3.The Zonal Deputy Tahsildar,
Thirupathur Taluk,
Sivagangai District.
4.The Chairman,
Tamil Nadu Generation and
Distribution Corporation Ltd.,
144 Anna Salai,
Chennai 600 002.
... Respondents
(R4 impleaded suomotu vide order of this Court dated 12.01.2022)
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified
Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned
eviction notice issued by the 3rd respondent herein and quash the
same as illegal and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2
herein to grant patta in favour of the petitioner in respect of
S.F.No.888/23, situated in Veliyathur Village, Thirupathur Taluk,
Sivagangai District and also not to disturb the possession over the
above said land based on the representation, dated 29.12.2021.
For Petitioners
: Mr.Mithun Chakravarthi
For Respondents
: Mr.S.R.A.Ramachandran,
Addl.Govt.Pleader
1/4
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
W.P.(MD) No.350 of 2022
O R D E R
S.VAIDYANATHAN, J.
and
DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.
This Writ Petition is filed to quash the eviction Notice, dated
16.12.2021 and consequently to grant patta for the land in
possession of the writ petitioner.
2. Being prima facie satisfied that the petitioner has
illegally encroached the Government land, Notice under Section 7 of
the Tamilnadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 has been issued. In such
circumstances, the petitioner has to establish that the land
belongs to him. At this juncture, it is worthwhile to refer the
said Notice, dated 16.12.2021.
n\l;A+y ;
fpuhkk;
rh;Nt
ek;gUk;
cl;gphpTk;
epyj;ijg ;
gw;wpa tpguk;
KO tp];
j Ph ;zk ;
n`f;Nlh;
mDgtj;jpypUf;fpw
tp];j P h ;zk ;
n`f;Nlh;
,d;d
tpjkhd
mDgtj;jpypUf;fp
wnjd;gJ
ntspahj;J}h;
888/23
muR
kid
fpuhk nghJ ,
lk;
0.09.17
0.00.41
M];ng];lh];
Nkw;$iu
t PL
ghj;&k ; kw;Wk;
Rw;Wr;Rth;
3. A reading of the above schedule would make it very clear
that the property does not belong to the petitioner and he has
encroached upon the Government land and had constructed bathroom and
compound.
4. This Court makes it clear that if any encroachment is found
to be made by the private parties, the electricity service
connection with respect to them shall be disconnected in the light
of the Judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in "P.Selvarajan
vs. The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Chennai and
others" (W.P.No. 21639 of 2017) decided on 13.02.2018, wherein the
Division Bench has observed as follows, in consonance with the order
of the Supreme Court dated 05.01.2018, passed in Special Leave to
Appeal (C) No. 33863 of 2017:
“3. Learned counsel appearing for the fourth
respondent submitted that the fourth respondent
has made an application for regularisation and
that during the pendency of the proceedings, this
Court, by order dated 11.09.2017, directed
disconnection of electricity in respect of
basement, second and third floors of the fourth
respondent's premises, against which, the matter
2/4
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
W.P.(MD) No.350 of 2022
was taken up to the Supreme Court. The Supreme
Court, in Petition for Special Leave to Appeal
(C).No.26509 of 2017, by order dated 13.10.2017,
did not interfere with the said order of this
Court dated 11.09.2017, and permitted the fourth
respondent herein to move the High Court. During
the pendency of this Writ Petition, the fourth
respo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.