SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI
Velankanni.S – Appellant
Versus
The Additional Chief Secretary – Respondent
WP(MD)/364/2023



Insurance companies are liable to pay the eligible amount to the members of the New Health Insurance Scheme, 2018, as per the recommendations of the District Level Committee and the Commissioner of Treasuries and Accounts.

Headnote:

HEALTH INSURANCE - NEW HEALTH INSURANCE SCHEME, 2018 - PAYMENT OF ELIGIBLE AMOUNT - DIRECTION TO INSURANCE COMPANY - The court directed the insurance company to consider the proposal sent by the Commissioner of Treasuries and Accounts and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a Graduate Teacher, was enrolled in the New Health Insurance Scheme, 2018. Her husband was admitted to the hospital with severe fever, cough, and breathlessness, and she incurred expenses of Rs. 3,00,481/- towards his treatment. The District Level Committee recommended payment of the expenditure, and the Commissioner of Treasuries and Accounts also recommended payment to the insurance company. However, the insurance company had not yet made the payment.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the insurance company to consider the proposal sent by the Commissioner of Treasuries and Accounts and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order.

Issues: Whether the insurance company was liable to pay the eligible amount to the petitioner as per the report sent by the Commissioner of Treasuries and Accounts and as per G.O.Ms.No.165, Finance (Health Insurance) Department, dated 01.06.2022.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on G.O.Ms.No.165, Finance (Health Insurance) Department, dated 01.06.2022, which provides for the payment of eligible amount to the members of the New Health Insurance Scheme, 2018.

Final Decision: The court directed the insurance company to consider the proposal sent by the Commissioner of Treasuries and Accounts and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order.

W.P.(MD)No.364 of 2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED : 06.01.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

W.P.(MD)No.364 of 2023

S.Velankanni

... Petitioner

Vs.

1. The Additional Chief Secretary,

Finance (Health Insurance) Department,

Secretariat,

Chennai - 600 009.

2. The Commissioner of Treasuries and Accounts,

3rd Floor, Anbazhagan Maaligai,

571, Anna Salai,

Nandanam,

Chennai – 600 035.

3. The Divisional Manager,

United India Insurance Company,

Divisional Office VI,

5th Floor, PLA Rathina Tower,

212, Anna Salai,

Chennai – 600 006.

... Respondents

_________

Page 1 of 6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.(MD)No.364 of 2023

PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 2 and

3, i.e., the Commissioner of Treasuries and Accounts, Chennai and the

Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited, Chennai to

make payment of the eligible amount to the petitioner as per the report sent

by the Commissioner of Treasuries an Accounts, Chennai also in his Letter

No.RC.6629/NHIS-1/2022, dated 27.07.2022 and as per G.O.Ms.No.165,

Finance (Health Insurance) Department, dated 01.06.2022.

For Petitioner

:

Mr.S.Visvalingam

For Respondents

:

Mrs.K.Christy Theboral

Addl. Govt. Pleader for R1 and R2

Mr.C.Karthik for R3

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed for a direction to the respondents

2 and 3, i.e., the Commissioner of Treasuries and Accounts, Chennai and the

Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited, Chennai to

make payment of the eligible amount to the petitioner as per the report sent

by the Commissioner of Treasuries an Accounts, Chennai also in his Letter

No.RC.6629/NHIS-1/2022, dated 27.07.2022 and as per G.O.Ms.No.165,

Finance (Health Insurance) Department, dated 01.06.2022.

_________

Page 2 of 6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.(MD)No.364 of 2023

2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is working as

Graduate Teacher in the Panchayat Union Middle School, Keezhappidavoor,

Manamadurai Union, Sivagangai District. The petitioner has been enrolled

as a member of the New Health Insurance Scheme, 2018 and a sum of

Rs.300/- is deducted every month from her salary towards subscription for

the said Scheme. While so, the petitioner's husband was suffering from

severe fever, cough and breathlessness and he was admitted in the hospital.

The petitioner has spent a sum of Rs.3,00,481/- (Rupees Three Lakhs Four

Hundred and Eighty One only) towards her husband's treatment. Hence, the

District Level Committee has recommended payment of the expenditure

incurred by her, vide letter dated 09.08.2021 to the Divisional Manager,

United India Insurance Company, Chennai, for making payment and also the

Commissioner of Treasuries and Accounts, Chennai, has recommended to

the Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited,

Chennai, for making payment vide letter No.Rc.No.6629/NHIS-1/2022,

dated 27.07.2022. However, till date, the same has not been considered by

the United India Insurance Company, Chennai. Therefore, the petitioner has

filed the present Writ Petition with the aforesaid prayer.

_________

Page 3 of 6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.(MD)No.364 of 2023

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit

that it would suffice, if the third respondent is directed to consider the

proposal sent by the second respondent dated 27.07.2022, in terms of

G.O.Ms.No.165, Finance (Health Insurance) Department, dated 01.06.2022

on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents has no

serious objection for such an order being passed by this Court.

5. Considering the limited request made by the learned counsel for

the petitioner, this Court, without going into the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top