SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Muthuramalingam – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector of Police – Respondent


Crl.A(MD)No.83 of 2023

Crl.A(MD)No.83 of 2023

K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J.

This appeal is listed today under the caption 'for being

mentioned' at the instance of the learned counsel for the appellant.

2. The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that there

was some typographical error in the order dated 11.08.2023 viz., crime

number was wrongly mentioned as “Crime No.3 of 2020” instead of

“Crime No.15 of 2021” and the special case number was typed as

Spl.S.C.No.17 of 2020” instead of “Spl.S.C.No.172 of 2021” and the

respondent police was typed as “Madurai Town All Women Police

Station” instead of “Thirupparankundram All Women Police

Station”.

4. Heard both side counsel and perused the order dated

11.08.2023 in Crl.A(MD)No.83 of 2023.

5.The learned Government Advocate(criminal side) has no

objection to carry out the above said corrections in the order dated

11.08.2023.

6. Since it is a typographical error, the Registry is directed to

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.A(MD)No.83 of 2023

carry out the above said corrections in the order copy dated 11.08.2023 in

Crl.A(MD)No.83 of 2023 wherever it is necessary and also to subst

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top