HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mrs Justice R. THARANI
Iyyappan – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector – Respondent
CRL OP(MD)/567/2022
CRL OP(MD). No.567 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Date : 25/01/2022
PRESENT
The Hon'ble Mrs.Justice R.THARANI
CRL OP(MD). No.567 of 2022
IYYAPPAN
... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED
VS
THE STATE REP. BY,
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION,
TIRUNELVELI RURAL.
(CRIME NO. 16 OF 2021).
... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Navaneetha Raja, Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr.S.S.Madhavan,
Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C.
PRAYER :-
For Bail in Crime No.16 of 2021 on the file of the Respondent
Police.
ORDER : The Court made the following order :-
The petitioner/Sole Accused herein, who was arrested on
14.11.2021 for the alleged offence under Sections 5(1) and 6 of
POCSO Act and Section 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.16 of 2021, on the
file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
2.The case against the petitioner is that he committed sexual
assault against the victim girl. Hence, a case in Crime No.16 of
2021 has been registered.
3.On the side of the petitioner it is stated that the
petitioner and the victim girl love each other. The victim is aged
about 17 years and 8 months. They are relatives. When their love
affair came to the knowledge of the victim's parents they foisted
the false case against the petitioner. The petitioner is not a
cousin brother. He is only a distant relative to the victim. The
petitioner is in custody for the past 73 days and prayed the
petitioner to be released on bail.
4.On the side of the prosecution it is stated that the
petitioner and the victim are under a prohibitory relationship. The
petitioner is a cousin brother to the victim. By threatening the
victim, the petitioner had committed sexual assault on a relative
cousin sister and prayed the petition to be dismissed.
5.It is seen that the age of the petitioner is 23 years.
1/2
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
CRL OP(MD). No.567 of 2022
Considering the age of the petitioner and that he is in custody for
past 73 days and considering the period of incarceration and
considering the fact that the major portion of the investigation
might have been completed by this time, this Court is inclined to
grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.
6.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed and
the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, on executing a
personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only)
with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the
learned Sessions Judge, Special Court for POCSO Act Cases,
Tirunelveli and on further condition that the petitioner shall
report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period
of thirty days.
sd/-
25/01/2022
/ TRUE COPY /
25/01/2022
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S-III)
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Madurai - 625 023.
Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic,
a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but,
ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct
copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant
concerned.
TO
1. THE SESSIONS JUDGE,
SPECIAL COURT FOR POCSO ACT CASES, TIRUNELVELI.
2. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION,
TIRUNELVELI RURAL.
3. THE SUPERINTENDENT,
CENTRAL PRISON, PALAYAMKOTTAI.
4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
ORDER
IN
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.