HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice G.ILANGOVAN
2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twelfth day
(MD) No.661
CRIMINAL LAW - SUSPENSION OF SENTENCE - SECTION 389(1) CRPC - [The court suspended the substantive sentence of imprisonment and directed the petitioner to be enlarged on bail, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Vedasandur and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the said Court at 10.30 a.m. on the first working day of every English Calendar month, pending disposal of the appeal.]
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner was convicted by the Judgment dated 22.05.2018 by the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Vedasandur, in C.C.No.60 of 1996 in the following manner. The learned Judicial Magistrate, Vedasandur sentenced the petitioner to undergo two years simple imprisonment for the offence punishable under Section 494 IPC and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/-, in default to undergo 3 months simple imprisonment. Against which criminal appeal in Crl.A.No.44 of 2018 has been filed before the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Dindigul. That appeal was dismissed and the sentence was confirmed by the appellate Court. Pending the appeal, the sentence was suspended by the appellate Court and fine amount was also paid. Against the dismissal, revision case in Crl.R.C.(MD). No.34 of 2022 has been filed along with this petition.
Finding of the Court:
Having regard to the fact that there are arguable points involved in the revision and further, the revision is not likely to be taken up for final hearing in the near future and also considering the fact the petitioner is already enjoyed the suspension of sentence during the course of appeal proceedings, I am of the considered opinion that the same benefit can be extended during the revision of proceedings also and the petitioner is entitled for the relief of suspension of sentence.
Issues: Whether the petitioner is entitled for the relief of suspension of sentence?
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on Section 389(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 which empowers the court to suspend the execution of a sentence pending an appeal or revision.
Final Decision: The court suspended the substantive sentence of imprisonment and directed the petitioner to be enlarged on bail, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Vedasandur and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the said Court at 10.30 a.m. on the first working day of every English Calendar month, pending disposal of the appeal.
CRL MP(MD) No.661 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Twelfth day of January Two Thousand and Twenty Two
PRESENT
The Hon'ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN
CRL MP(MD) No.661 of 2022
IN
CRL RC(MD) No.34 of 2022
PANDURANGAN ... PETITIONER/PETITIONER
Vs
KRISHNAVENI @ POMMUTHAI ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT
Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein
and in the petition filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to
suspend the sentence imposed on the peittioner by the learned
Additional District and Sessions Judge, Dindigul in Criminal Appeal
No.44 of 2018 dated. 10.12.2021 by confirming the order passed in
C.C.No.60 of 1996 on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial
Magistrate at Vedasandur, dated 22.05.2018 pending disposal of the
above Criminal Revision Petition.
Prayer in CRL RC(MD). 34/ 2022 :
To call for the records pertaining to the order of conviction
in C.A. No. 44 of 2018 dated. 10.12.2021 passed by the learned
Additional District and Sessions Judge, Dindigul in confirming the
order passed by the Learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
at Vedasandur in C.C.No.60 of 1996 on 22.05.2018 and set aside the
same by allowing the Revision Petition.
Order : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon
perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the
arguments of M/S. MAHENDRAN.K., Advocate for the petitioner, the
court made the following order:-
The petitioner was convicted by the Judgment dated 22.05.2018
by the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Vedasandur,
in C.C.No.60 of 1996 in the following manner. The learned Judicial
Magistrate, Vedasandur sentenced the petitioner to undergo two years
simple imprisonment for the offence punishable under Section 494 IPC
and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/-, in default to undergo 3 months
simple imprisonment. Against which criminal appeal in Crl.A.No.44 of
2018 has been filed before the learned Additional District and
Sessions Judge, Dindigul. That appeal was dismissed and the sentence
was confirmed by the appellate Court. Pending the appeal, the
sentence was suspended by the appellate Court and fine amount was
also paid. Against the dismissal, revision case in Crl.R.C.(MD).
No.34 of 2022 has been filed along with this petition.
1/2
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
CRL MP(MD) No.661 of 2022
2.Heard the submissions of the learned Government Advocate
(Criminal Side).
3.Having regard to the fact that there are arguable points
involved in the revision and further, the revision is not likely to
be taken up for final hearing in the near future and also
considering the fact the petitioner is already enjoyed the
suspension of sentence during the course of appeal proceedings, I am
of the considered opinion that the same benefit can be extended
during the revision of proceedings also and the petitioner is
entitled for the relief of suspension of sentence.
4.Accordingly, the substantive sentence of imprisonment alone
is suspended and the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail,
on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of
Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties each for a
like sum to the satisfaction of the learned District Munsif cum
Judicial Magistrate, Vedasandur and on further condition that the
petitioners shall appear before the said Court at 10.30 a.m. on the
first working day of every English Calendar month, pending disposal
of the appeal.
sd/-
12/01/2022
/ TRUE COPY /
12/01/2022
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S-I)
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.