MADRAS HIGH COURT
Honourable Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN
V.Malarmannan – Appellant
Versus
The Superintendent – Respondent
HCP(MD)/45/2022
H.C.P.(MD)No.45 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 20.01.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
and
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
H.C.P.(MD)No.45 of 2022
V.Malarmannan
... Petitioner /
Husband of the detenue
Vs.
1.The Superintendent of Police,
Madurai City,
Madurai.
2. The Inspector of Police,
Melur Police Station,
Maduria District.
(In Crime No.532/2021)
... Respondents
PRAYER: Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to direct
the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the body or person of the
detenue, namely, Pandiselvi @ Brindha, wife of V.Malarmannan, aged
about 34 years before this Court and set her at liberty.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ramasamy
For Respondents : Mr.S.Ravi
Additional Public Prosecutor
O R D E R
S.VAIDYANATHAN, J.
And
DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.
[Order of the Court was made by DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.]
The petitioner, who is the husband of one Pandiselvi @ Brindha,
alleging that his wife was missing from home since 15.08.2021, has
filed the present Habeas Corpus Petition after lodging a complaint
before the second respondent police, which was registered as Crime
1/3
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
H.C.P.(MD)No.45 of 2022
No.532 of 2021 under 'woman missing'. In the affidavit, it is
contended that the petitioner married Pandiselvi in the year 2006
and have two children, one aged 13 years and another, aged 11 years.
While so, suddenly she has gone missing.
2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that
the wife of the petitioner has eloped with one Manikandan, son of
Asokan, who is her erstwhile lover. This is the second time she has
eloped with him and the information received by the police indicates
that she is living with the said Manikandan somewhere near
Coimbatore.
3. The petitioner herein has suppressed the earlier episode of
elopement, which was taken for investigation by the second
respondent police in the month of August, 2020 in CSR No.1699 of
2020.
4. In the said circumstances, this Court is of the view that
the petitioner has to work out his remedy before the appropriate
forum and not trouble the police to bring back his estranged wife,
who has eloped on her own.
5. With the above observation, this Habeas Corpus Petition
stands dismissed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CS-II)
// True Copy //
/ /2022
Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
PJL
Note:In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a
web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but,
ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the
correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate/litigant
concerned.
To
1.The Superintendent of Police,
Madurai City,
Madurai.
2. The Inspector of Police,
Melur Police Station,
Maduria District.
2/3
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
H.C.P.(MD)No.45 of 2022
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor,
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Madurai.
H.C.P.(MD)No.45 of 2022
20.01.2022
RK/CK(03/02/2022) 3P 4C
3/3
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.